Betri Reykjavik - e-democracy

Betri Reykjavik - e-democracy


Problems and Purpose

Betri Reykjavik, or Better Reykjavik is an online platform that hosts two participatory initiatives: Citizen Foundation, (est. 2008) and the Your Priorities (est. 2009). It is freely accessible by any government or municipality around the world.

Betri Reykjavik combines deliberative and participatory democracy and gives citizens a space where they can suggest, debate and vote for budgetary decisions and other communal projects, without facing issues due to social or political background like in other modes of public citizens’ deliberation. Betri Reykjavik is independent and not affiliated with a specific political party, however political parties as well as ordinary citizens are encouraged to participate and propose their ideas on how to change Reykjavik for the better.


Know what events led up to this initiative? Help us complete this section!

Originating Entities and Funding

Betri Reykjavik was designed and published by Gunnar Grímsson and Róbert Bjarnason. The platform was founded in 2010 and is based on two other projects founded by Grímsson and Bjarnason. The project is not-for-profit and non-partisan.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

The website is open to all but registration is required to submit proposals or vote. 

Methods and Tools Used

The Betri Reykjavik platform's initiatives are examples of online participatory budgeting and participatory planning. Both methods involve "a decision-making process through which citizens deliberate and negotiate over the distribution of public resources." There are many benefits associated with participatory budgeting and planning including increased civic and democratic education; increased government transparency; and an increased opportunity for participation by historically marginalized populations.[1

Deliberation, Decisions, and Public Interaction

Citizens can register for Betri Reykjavik on a special website, using their electronic-ID which is also used for submitting their tax forms. Participation itself is simple. Once registered a member can freely post his or her ideas on improving communal life, which are then open to public discussion on the website. The voting system itself works somewhat like YouTube. One can either “like” or “dislike” proposed ideas of others, can add own suggestions and debate with other members about it.

Each month sixteen ideas, which have the most “likes”, are discussed by the City Council in special meetings. Projects are founded via a yearly budget. In 2012 the budget for communal projects coming from Betri Reykjavik were around 300 million ISK, which is roughly 1.6 million GBP. Accepted ideas together with the proposed budget are later on open for voting on Betri Reykjavik. 

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Past projects include the life improvement of the homeless during winter in 2011, and transforming the main commercial street in the city, the Laugavegur, to a pedestrian only zone in 2012.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

The innovation is a change to old modes of representative democracy, and gives citizens the chance to be heard and to actively take part in the city’s politics. Since its establishment Betri Reykjavik had 22.800 unique visitors and has now 2.900 active users. Betri Reykjavik so far has been a huge success and can be an example on how to enable citizens to actively participate in the 21st century.



Rushton, S., (2013). Direct Democracy in Reykjavík: The wisdom of the Icelandic crowd-sources. [online] Available from:

Andersen, A., (2012). E-democracy takes off in Reykjavik. [online] The Reykjavik Grapevine. Available from:

Reykjavíkurborg, (2012). The e-voting to create a better Reykjavik has started. [online] Reykjavíkurborg. Available from:

External Links

Case Data


64° 8' 7.2168" N, 21° 53' 42.756" W


What was the intended purpose?: 


Start Date: 
Tuesday, January 1, 2008
End Date: 
[no data entered]
Number of Meeting Days: 
[no data entered]


Targeted Participants (Demographics): 
Targeted Participants (Public Roles): 
Method of Recruitment: 


If yes, were they ...: 
[no data entered]
Facetoface, Online or Both: 
Decision Method(s)?: 
Other: Decision Method: 
Up/Down Voting


Who paid for the project or initiative?: 
[no data entered]
Who was primarily responsible for organizing the initiative?: 
[no data entered]
Type of Organizing Entity: 
[no data entered]
Who else supported the initiative? : 
[no data entered]
Types of Supporting Entities: 
[no data entered]


Total Budget: 
[no data entered]
Average Annual Budget: 
US$2 675 680.00
Number of Full-Time Staff: 
[no data entered]
Number of Part-Time Staff: 
[no data entered]
Staff Type: 
[no data entered]
Number of Volunteers: 
[no data entered]


No discussions have been started yet.