In order to effectively allow local residents, particularly young people in the community, to engage in the democratic process of directing funds toward play and recreation design in East Devon, UK, a participatory budgeting event was implemented.
Note: the following entry is incomplete. You can help Participedia by adding to it.
Problems and Purpose
In the prevailing economic conditions, East Devon Council decided to put existing public funds up for participatory budgeting. In discussions with services, an opportunity with Section 106 funding which the council collects from building developers to spend on play and recreation to mitigate the effects of the development. Usually Section 106 agreements are flexible in the details, which means that the developer sets aside a certain amount of money to spend on a play area but the details of what is in the play area can be decided by the local residents.
One of the Council’s priorities is ‘Children and Young People’ and inviting them to help design and vote on play and recreation provided an excellent opportunity for the Council to engage with children and young people. The findings were presented to councillors who decided that, whenever possible and appropriate, PB should be used when spending Section 106 money on play and recreation in East Devon.
Background History and Context
Know what events led up to this initiative? Help us complete this section!
Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities
Know who organized or funded this initiative? Help us complete this section!
Participant Recruitment and Selection
Know how participants were recruited? Help us complete this section!
Methods and Tools Used
This initiative uses participatory budgeting, an increasingly common method of democratic innovation broadly described as "a decision-making process through which citizens deliberate and negotiate over the distribution of public resources." There are many benefits associated with participatory budgeting including increased civic and democratic education; increased government transparency; and an increased opportunity for participation by historically marginalized populations [1].
What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation
Know how people participated or what public interaction looked like? Help us complete this section!
Influence, Outcomes, and Effects
Each PB/Section 106 project is planned on an individual basis with varying levels of involvement from local residents, Town and Parish Councils, officers from East Devon District Council and ward councillors. So far PB has been used in five projects distributing a total in excess of £200,000 of Section 106 funds. It is always emphasised that the most important part of the process is that whatever the local residents, children and young people vote for, will actually happen.
All the projects so far have been very different. Here are two examples [1]:
- A new housing development in Budleigh Salterton meant that we had £30,000 from developers to spend on a new play area. Working with residents officers found out they wanted the play area to be made of natural materials in natural colours. By talking to local schoolchildren officers also identified the sort of activities children wanted for play area, such as climbing. This feedback was included in tender documentation sent to play companies. Three of the designs that came back from the companies met all the requirements. Again the District Council organised a play event and invited all the residents in the development to participate. As part of the event, adult and children residents voted on which of the three play area designs they wanted. The winning play area received over half of the votes and is now being installed.
- There was £100,000 of Section 106 money to spend on play and recreation in Axminster. Axminster Town Council asked local community groups to submit proposals on how they would like the money to be spent. The proposals were looked at for technical details by the Section 106 officer. The Town Council wrote a questionnaire asking residents to prioritise the projects and placed it in the local newspaper for people to fill in and send back. To gain a wider range of views, the District Council organised and ran a face to face voting event with local residents by taking over a market stall at one of the town’s market days. A total of 227 people voted on the projects, and are now working with the Town Council and the projects that got the funding, to make them happen.
Analysis and Lessons Learned
Want to contribute an analysis of this initiative? Help us complete this section!
See Also
Participatory Budgeting by Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue
References
[1] Original Source: https://www.participatorybudgeting.org.uk/case-studies/section-106-funding-in-east-devon/
External Links
https://www.participatorybudgeting.org.uk/
East Devon website: http://eastdevon.gov.uk/community-engagement/participatory-budgeting/
East Devon website Section 106 agreements
East Devon participatory budgeting 2013
Notes
This case study was originally submitted to the Participatory Budgeting Unit by the organisers of the project, using a template supplied by the PB Unit.
