Data

General Issues
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Infrastructure
Location
Bruxelles
Bruxelles
Belgique
Scope of Influence
Neighbourhood
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Collaborate
Total Number of Participants
8
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Appointment
Targeted Demographics
Women
Men
Stakeholder Organizations
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate decision-making
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Legality
No
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Site Visits
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
If Voting
Unanimous Decision
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Traditional Media
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
STIB Société des Transports Intercommunaux de Bruxelles
Type of Funder
Local Government
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in how institutions operate
Implementers of Change
Appointed Public Servants
Formal Evaluation
No

CASE

Citizen panel 1 MOVE NOhW: Together, let’s get Neder-Over-Heembeek moving

January 11, 2024 Ils Taildeman
General Issues
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Infrastructure
Location
Bruxelles
Bruxelles
Belgique
Scope of Influence
Neighbourhood
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Collaborate
Total Number of Participants
8
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Appointment
Targeted Demographics
Women
Men
Stakeholder Organizations
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate decision-making
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Legality
No
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Site Visits
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
If Voting
Unanimous Decision
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Traditional Media
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
STIB Société des Transports Intercommunaux de Bruxelles
Type of Funder
Local Government
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in how institutions operate
Implementers of Change
Appointed Public Servants
Formal Evaluation
No

Citizen participation was at the heart of the decision-making process for this new tram line project for Neder-Over-Heembeek, one of the districts of Brussels. The first stages of large infrastructure projects are often reserved for experts or policy makers. As part of this new tram line project, we wanted to open the debate very early in the project by involving citizens in the first technical discussions and by transparently involving them in the fundamental strategic decisions for its future development. This is why, from the first phase, the impact study (2019-2020), a citizen panel was integrated into the steering committee, made up of design offices in the fields of mobility, infrastructure , stability, the environment, and the project team. Together, they shared their knowledge of the neighborhood and co-decided, through collective intelligence, the route of the tram.

Problems and objectives

The population and workers of Neder-Over-Heembeek companies should benefit from an alternative to the car. Here are the objectives that the new tram line must meet:

  • Better connect all the districts of the City of Brussels to the rest of the Brussels-Capital Region.
  • Connect important mobility nodes.
  • Improve the living environment, safety and conviviality of public spaces throughout the route, thanks to numerous urban developments.


History and context

The Neder-Over-Heembeek district is developing: more than 1,000 housing units were created in Neder-Over-Heembeek in 2021, new jobs are planned at the Solvay campus, at Bpost, at Bruxelles Propreté. In addition, new educational establishments are expected.

After 15 years of significant investments by the city of Brussels, after the development of housing, collective infrastructure and public services, it is mobility which is at the heart of all attention in Neder-Over-Heembeek. A unique possibility, through a tram project, to better connect the district to the rest of the Region is offered to this part of the city. Which will also profoundly improve the quality of public space throughout the route. Today, the city of Brussels, the Region and STIB are proposing the route of the new tram line which will connect Neder-Over-Heembeek to the city center and to the entire Region.


Organizing, supporting and financing organizations

STIB, The City of Brussels


Recruitment and selection of participants

8 representatives with different profiles were sought to compose a citizen panel: 1 representative of traders, 2 representatives of local associations, 5 residents with different profiles in terms of gender, age, place of residence, mode of transport.

The call for applications to participate in the citizen panels was distributed to all residents of the neighborhood. During the call for the first panel, 43 citizens applied. In the end, 8 candidates were selected.


Methods and tools used

During the impact study phase the citizen panel was able to participate in the analysis of the existing situation in terms of mobility and in the organization of a field visit for technical experts. They were also involved in the writing of a survey, which was sent to all residents, in order to ask them about the different criteria that were important to them when choosing the type of public transport: the capacity of the means of transport , movement speed, etc. Once the mode of transport was chosen, the citizen panel participated in the multi-criteria analysis methodology, for which each stakeholder in the steering committee had to assign points to each criterion (infrastructure, potential and accessibility, mobility, town planning and environment). . This resulted in 5 criteria which were decisive for the analysis of more than 23 route options.

Finally, the panel of citizens was able to choose, from more than 23 options, the route that seemed best for the construction of the tramway. In this final negotiation process, each partner in the steering group had an equal voice and a final route was chosen using collective intelligence. This method was also innovative in this type of consent decision-making process.

The citizen panel also participated in the creation of communication tools with citizens, drawing on their expertise as residents / traders / associations. They developed a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) developed with the project stakeholders, they checked the accessibility and wording of the web page and distributed information on the information evenings.


What happened: processes, interactions and participation

Here are the steps of the participatory process:

01/25/2019 : Ransbeek neighborhood committee meeting

04/03/2019 : information moment

05/21/2019 : panel meeting: explanation of mission, context, tram project

09/18/2019 : public meeting 1: information about the impact study

20/10-04/11/2019 : online survey

11/30/2019 : public meeting 2: multi-criteria analysis presentation

01/02/2020  : public meeting 3: presentation of the tram route


Influence, results and effects

The citizen panel not only participated in meetings with the project team, but they also played an important role in representing the voice of residents, associations and merchants in the neighborhood. They have also been important interlocutors in informing people and explaining ongoing discussions. In total, a group of 350 citizens was affected by the entire participation process.


Analysis and lessons learned

By integrating a citizen panel into the tram project steering committee, this project fully contributed to the objective of transparency and renewal of local policies, where decisions are not taken above the heads of citizens, but with them. It was the first time in Brussels history of a redevelopment project of such magnitude that citizens were given such a place. Furthermore, it was also unprecedented that participation started so early, namely during the project impact study, when it usually only takes place during the construction study.


external links

https://move-nohw.brussels/fr/project