Data

General Issues
Environment
Health
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Social Determinants of Health
Location
Dortmund
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Germany
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
https://www.domap.de/
http://www.vpl.tu-dortmund.de/cms/en/index.html
https://www.dortmund-airport.com/airport-news/2018/the-district-government-of-muenster-approves-longer-operating-hours-at-dortmund-airport
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Preferential Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Traditional Media
New Media

CASE

Noise Action Plan (Lärmaktionsplan) in Dortmund, Germany

2 décembre 2018 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
17 octobre 2017 jgabler
12 décembre 2014 jgabler
General Issues
Environment
Health
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Social Determinants of Health
Location
Dortmund
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Germany
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
https://www.domap.de/
http://www.vpl.tu-dortmund.de/cms/en/index.html
https://www.dortmund-airport.com/airport-news/2018/the-district-government-of-muenster-approves-longer-operating-hours-at-dortmund-airport
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Preferential Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Traditional Media
New Media

In 2012, Dortmund began an online project to expand a city noise map, the base for plans targeting noise reduction as required by environmental protection policies and laws. Citizens could report noise problems and to-be-protected areas, with results used for analysis and debate.

Problems and Purpose

The city of Dortmund in Germany was instructed to create noise action plans as a result of the EU Policy on Environmental Noise passed in 2002. One part of these kind of plans is the creation of noise maps that compile data on noise problems throughout the city which are then used for the development of measures targeting the elimination of most of these problems. The environmental agency of the city of Dortmund decided to directly involve their citizens into the process of creating a noise map of the city area, enabling them to give feedback to the city’s current status of the noise action plan and upgrade it with not directly measurable, more subjective data about noise problems, but also quiet city areas for protection.

Background History and Context

In 2007, the first noise action plan in Dortmund was created. This first plan was made public in January 2012, when the project involving civic participation was started. From January 9 to February 10, the first version of the city’s noise action plan was publicly accessible. In the same time, continuing onwards until February 14, the public was enabled to share their thoughts about the current noise action plan and upgrade the existing noise map of the city area throughout an online citizens’ forum. With the end of the active participation time, the results of the online project were collected and made public in a later statement by the city council as well as integrated into the city’s process of targeting noise problem elimination.

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

The citizen’s forum was created by the city of Dortmund’s Environmental Agency, with the Department Head of Planning, Construction and Environment, Martin Lürwer, in charge of the project. A project of the city administration, its funding consisted of fiscal revenue available with the city’s budget.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Participants for the citizens’ forum consisted mainly of Dortmund citizens, as they were the group targeted for the identification of noise problems and to-be-protected city areas. There was no selection by the initiator, as access to the citizens’ forum was enabled without any restrictions and did not even require any form of registration. The majority of participants, however, did at least state a name, being private persons or more often groups of citizens as well as citizens’ movements.

For participants in the crowdsourcing of noise information, the city of Dortmund launched several publicity campaigns to gain public attention and to attract possible contributors. Posters were attached to tram cars, buses and in subway stations as well as displayed in public buildings and at official events organized by the city administration. There were also several press releases by the city as well as news coverage by local media, especially local newspapers.

Methods and Tools Used

This case used a mixed-methodology to acheive its two purposes: 1) defining and categorizing noise problems and proposing solutions, and 2) crowdsourcing noise data. To achieve the former, an online Citizens' Forum was created to allow for dialogue and debate. To gather noise data, organizers employed various channels of crowdsourcing including email, phone, and mail. 

Deliberation, Decisions, and Public Interaction

Users of the citizen’s forum were able to create their own contributions by stating a noise problem, categorizing it with the categories provided by the environmental agency, mark it on the noise map of the city and comment on which kind of problem they were explaining. The same was enabled in order to indicate quiet city areas for protection as well. Furthermore, users had the ability not only to introduce new problems, but also to comment and rate existing contributions as well as the current status of the city’s noise targeting projects. This also did not required any kind of previous registration. The city administration also enabled the public to contribute not only by using the citizens’ forum, but also via e-mail, phone or mail. Contributions via these channels were subsequently uploaded onto the citizens’ forum by administrators.

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The results of the citizens’ forum were collected by the environmental agency and later publicly disclosed. As the city administration states, the results were used for the ongoing political consultations on noise targeting in the city, eventually leading to new measures to target noise problems and protecting quiet areas throughout the city area.

Aside from the political effects of the project, on the citizens’ side the effects are described as a form of semi-direct political participation, especially for citizens’ movements whose concerns could be directed towards the city administration. The success of this kind of participation is exemplified by the numbers of contributions via the citizens’ forum. With over 1,300 contributions, over 700 comments and over 5,000 ratings of contributions and measures, the project was described as being more successful than comparable projects with similar purposes in cities in North-Rhine Westphalia.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

The participation patterns recognizable by analysing the citizens’ forum differ in some aspects from expectations especially when concerning online participation projects. While every city district was represented equally in terms of participation, districts with lower social status tended to be slightly underrepresented. This, as well as the fact that a vast majority of contributors who stated their gender were male, was in line with expectations concerning this kind of project. Looking at the participating age groups, however, the majority was observed to be aged 45 to 54 years. While this is dominating overall population, it is not the group traditionally participating most in online projects. The demographic analysis of the noise action plan project can interpreted in some ways, with a clear one being that this kind of project at least attracts people of age groups that are not usually participating in online projects while leaving especially younger age-sets out, which, however, can also be seen as an effect of the purpose of the project not targeting younger people as much as those of higher age-sets.

Analysing the contents of the contributions made via the citizens’ forum, a vast majority (over 60 %) of contributions were made to introduce personal problems with street traffic noise, which therefore seems to be the most urging problem considering noise in the city area. Other noise categories were almost equally represented, while the dominating category of described noise varied slightly throughout the city districts. Concerning the rating of contributions, it could be seen that while many contributions remained uncommented and unrated, the 5,000 ratings concentrated on relatively few contributions. Especially the contributions concerning quiet city areas to protect were rated very positively, indicating that the protection of designated quiet areas throughout the city is almost an important matter to the citizens of Dortmund as the elimination of heavy street traffic noise.

With the decisions on implementations of further measures against noise problems in Dortmund still pending and being subject to fiscal matters as well as political points of view, it cannot be considered clear if many of the contributions that were made via the online project will be leading to effective measures against noise problems in the city. With a relatively high and lively participation, however, the overall goal of the environmental agency to upgrade their noise action plan by including subjective data obtained from the citizens’ point of view can be considered achieved.

See Also

References

Märker, Oliver & Ruesch, Michelle (2012) - Inhaltliche Auswertung der Bürgerbeteiligung an der Lärmaktionsplanung in Dortmund. Zebralog GmbH & Co KG, Bonn.

External Links

Virtual Town Hall of the City of Dortmund (German)

EU Local Noise Action Plans 

Dortmund Airport and Noise Protection 

Technische Universitat Dortmund 

Notes

Lead Image: Noise Barrier in Germany https://goo.gl/GuEnoZ

Secondary Image: Dortmund, Germany https://goo.gl/6jeaPW