Data

General Issues
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Budget - Local
Government Spending
Public Amenities
Location
Winnipeg
Canada
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Parent of this Case
Winnipeg Budget Consultations
Files
https://s3.amazonaws.com/participedia.prod/a8b5b281-49a1-48c1-a642-ed833fa34a5c_2017_Report.pdf
Links
https://www.winnipeg.ca/interhom/Budget/2017Budget/default.stm
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
950
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Opinion Survey
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
City of Winnipeg
Type of Funder
Local Government
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Implementers of Change
Appointed Public Servants

CASE

Winnipeg "Let’s Talk" Budget Consultation 2017

March 9, 2019 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
September 23, 2018 Aengus Bridgman
September 22, 2018 Aengus Bridgman
General Issues
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Budget - Local
Government Spending
Public Amenities
Location
Winnipeg
Canada
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Parent of this Case
Winnipeg Budget Consultations
Files
https://s3.amazonaws.com/participedia.prod/a8b5b281-49a1-48c1-a642-ed833fa34a5c_2017_Report.pdf
Links
https://www.winnipeg.ca/interhom/Budget/2017Budget/default.stm
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
950
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Opinion Survey
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
City of Winnipeg
Type of Funder
Local Government
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Implementers of Change
Appointed Public Servants

The 2017 budget consultations were the second to be conducted by the Winnipeg Office of Public Engagement. The consultations consisted of an online survey tool, a wikisurvey tool, and a telephone survey.

Note: the following entry is missing citations. Please help us verify its content. 

Problems and Purpose

The 2017 process was named Let's Talk: Building a Stronger Winnipeg Together. The purpose of the public consultation was to collect high level input and feedback on spending priorities and preferences for revenue generation. 

Background History and Context

Building on the earlier success of mass participation in City planning in the form of OurWinnipeg, the City launched public budget consultations in 2014 to solicit and compile feedback from Winnipeggers into city budget and planning priorities. This work was contracted out to a consulting firm (MNP) which was generally perceived to have conducted an ineffective process with few shifts in spending as a result of community input. The following year another consulting firm conducted a similar exercise which included a series of town hall meetings and an online survey with the results ultimately not reported to council or released to the public. This rocky start to formal budget consultations in the city caught the attention of the incoming Mayor Brian Bowman (assumed office at the end of 2014), who had made a campaign promise to improve public consultation for both the budget and other projects. To this end, Bowman established an Office of Public Engagement in 2015 with a mandate to support all City activities and projects through public consultation and engagement.

After a successful 2016 budget consultation process, the number of opportunities for engagement were expanded with in-person `Community Conversations' and telephone survey's being added. These additional mechanisms were not accompanied by an expansion of participation (in fact the opposite) with approximately 900 participants (0.1% of the Winnipeg population).

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

The process was organized by the Office of Public Engagement with the support of Dialogue Partners. The Office of Public Engagement and the budget consultation process were funded through regular operations of the City of Winnipeg. 

Participant Recruitment and Selection

All members of the public were free to participate. However, most of the participation (approximately two-thirds) were recruited through a telephone survey, with the remaining split between the website, community conversations, and community visits. The majority of participants were full-time workers, with an even split between 18-34, 35-55, and 55+ respondents.

Methods and Tools Used

Similar to previous years, there were a variety of methods used to solicit input. The three main ways were: an online engagement tool, a series of community conversations and visits, and a telephone survey.

The Let's Talk interactive online discussion tool that was developed for participants to respond to and share with others their responses to key project questions. Interested participants could respond to surveys, share stories, and generally provide their best advice to the City. The platform was bilingual. There were a series of "Community Conversations and Visits" that were held. There were five of these hosted at different times and locations through the week. A 600-person telephone survey was conducted. These different mechanisms were used not to gather different types of input but rather to ensure a wider consultation net was cast.

The telephone survey used quota sampling to produce a representative sample.

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

There was little deliberation or education as part of the campaign, with direct feedback solicited and then compiled for input into the budget process. Relative percentage support for different spending priorities were assessed, but the report did note that priorities and preferences for city spending and revenue generation are varied and that citizens disagreed about fundamental components of the consultation (e.g. should taxes be decreased or increased).

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The consultation report provided a list of guiding principles to the city that represents the distilled findings of the consultation.

  • Spending Wisely: finding efficiencies and opportunities for innovation
  • Communication and transparency
  • Desire for opportunities to support decision-making
  • Aligning spending choices of today with a vision for tomorrow

The highest priority services identified in the online and telephone survey include: street and sideway maintenance, public transit, roadway snow removal, and waste collection.

Part of the Winnipeg budget consultations is to play an awareness increasing function and there was some engagement on twitter and through the website, albeit limited. 

Analysis and Lessons Learned

There were a series of methodology limitations identified. In particular, the consultation process focused on gathering input as opposed to any more deliberative or discussion-based model. This meant that trade-offs were not considered and those compiling the feedback were only able to report absolute numbers in favour or against specific proposals. Also the financial cost of particular issues were not considered. As the results of the survey were not necessarily fully representative or statistically valid, this exercise cannot be considered as genuine, meaningful, and impactful consultation.

As in previous years, citizens continued to be interested in additional background information and better communication from the city. While not as strongly worded as the 2014 report, there is a continuing concern that only informed consultation is meaningful. The report contained the recommendation that the consultation be started earlier and that input be tied to the development of the budget in a more meaningful way.

A number of participants stated that following-up and “closing the loop” are critical components of any consultation process. Participants would be more likely to participate if they felt their voice was heard and if they could see how their input was used in decision-making. This is a key challenge of the budget consultation process in Winnipeg.

See Also

Winnipeg Budget Consultations

Winnipeg Budget Consultation 2018

References

External Links

Notes