Data

General Issues
Health
Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice & Corrections
Specific Topics
Social Determinants of Health
Public Safety
Quality of Health Care
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Liverpool
England
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
Report: The Liverpool Citysafe Trailblazers Netherley Valley Citizens’ Jury
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Social mobilization
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
18
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Citizens' Jury
Survey
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Listen/Watch as Spectator
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Opinion Survey
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
Home Office, via Liverpool City Council
Type of Funder
Local Government

CASE

Netherley Valley Citizens' Jury on Reducing Anti-Social Behaviour

Netherley Valley Citizens' Jury Recommendations – Credit: Fiona Haigh & Alex Scott-Samual
August 3, 2020 Joyce Chen
July 11, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
July 9, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Health
Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice & Corrections
Specific Topics
Social Determinants of Health
Public Safety
Quality of Health Care
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Liverpool
England
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
Report: The Liverpool Citysafe Trailblazers Netherley Valley Citizens’ Jury
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Social mobilization
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
18
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Citizens' Jury
Survey
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Listen/Watch as Spectator
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Opinion Survey
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
Home Office, via Liverpool City Council
Type of Funder
Local Government
This entry was originally added in English. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

Netherley Valley Citizens' Jury consisted of 18 people who, across four days in April 2004, developed recommendations for how anti-social behaviour (ASB) should be dealt with within their community.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.  

Edit case