Data

General Issues
Social Welfare
Specific Topics
Public Safety
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Mitaka
Tokyo
Japan
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Overview of Mitaka City 2006 town development discussion
Mitaka City town development discussions
Mitaka town development discussion 2006 announcement
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Total Number of Participants
52
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Civic Lottery
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Listen/Watch as Spectator
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
Jointly held by Junior Chamber International Mitaka and Mitaka City Government
Type of Funder
Local Government
Community Based Organization
Staff
No

CASE

Mitaka's 2006 Town Development Discussion on Safety

Mitaka City 2006 town development discussion – Credit: Mitaka City
August 3, 2020 Joyce Chen
July 19, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
July 18, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Social Welfare
Specific Topics
Public Safety
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Mitaka
Tokyo
Japan
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Overview of Mitaka City 2006 town development discussion
Mitaka City town development discussions
Mitaka town development discussion 2006 announcement
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Total Number of Participants
52
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Civic Lottery
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Listen/Watch as Spectator
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Funder
Jointly held by Junior Chamber International Mitaka and Mitaka City Government
Type of Funder
Local Government
Community Based Organization
Staff
No
This entry was originally added in English. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

In 2006, the 52 participants of the Mitaka Town Development Discussion convened to deliberate the development of safety and security in local community and support for children in the city.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

2012: Discussion on Revising the Mitaka City Disaster Prevention Plan

FY 2015: Discussion about the First Revision of the Fourth Mitaka City Basic Plan

Planning Cells

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en. 

Edit case