Data

General Issues
Health
Specific Topics
Resilience Planning & Design
Public Safety
Disease Prevention
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
South Korea
Scope of Influence
National
Links
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Technology and citizens: A case study of the first citizens’ jury in South Korea
An analysis of citizens' jury on the Korean national pandemic response system : technology and citizens
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Research
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
14
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Civic Lottery
Citizens' Jury
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Budget of Center for Democracy in Science and Technology (CDST)
Type of Funder
Non-Governmental Organization
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Changes in civic capacities
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
Formal Evaluation
Yes
Evaluation Report Links
Technology and Citizens: A Case Study of the First Citizens’ Jury in South Korea

CASE

South Korean Citizens' Jury on the National Pandemic Response System

Avian influenza response tracking in South Korea – Credit: Yonhap/EPA
August 24, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
August 24, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Health
Specific Topics
Resilience Planning & Design
Public Safety
Disease Prevention
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
South Korea
Scope of Influence
National
Links
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Technology and citizens: A case study of the first citizens’ jury in South Korea
An analysis of citizens' jury on the Korean national pandemic response system : technology and citizens
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Research
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
14
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Civic Lottery
Citizens' Jury
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Budget of Center for Democracy in Science and Technology (CDST)
Type of Funder
Non-Governmental Organization
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Changes in civic capacities
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
Formal Evaluation
Yes
Evaluation Report Links
Technology and Citizens: A Case Study of the First Citizens’ Jury in South Korea
This entry was originally added in English. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

From August to September 2008, the 14 members of the Citizens' Jury on the National Pandemic Response System met to provide opinions on South Korea's existing national pandemic response system.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en. 

Edit case