Data

General Issues
Health
Specific Topics
Youth Issues
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Minnesota
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Total Number of Participants
96
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Civic Lottery
Citizens' Jury
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Traditional Media
Primary Organizer/Manager
Jefferson Center
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Commissioned by The Health and Human Services Committee of the Minnesota Senate, funded by Blandin Foundation
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
No
Formal Evaluation
Yes

CASE

Minnesotan Policy Jury on School-Based Clinics

October 18, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
October 17, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
September 2, 2020 Joyce Chen
September 1, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Health
Specific Topics
Youth Issues
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Minnesota
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Total Number of Participants
96
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Civic Lottery
Citizens' Jury
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Traditional Media
Primary Organizer/Manager
Jefferson Center
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Commissioned by The Health and Human Services Committee of the Minnesota Senate, funded by Blandin Foundation
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
No
Formal Evaluation
Yes

In 1988, eight 12-person juries were held around the state of Minnesota (one in each congressional district) to evaluate the usefulness of school-based clinics to help prevent teen pregnancy, AIDS and other STDs. A statewide jury of 24 jurors made the final recommendations.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en