Data

General Issues
Science & Technology
Specific Topics
Biomedical Research & Development
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Denmark
Scope of Influence
National
Links
Consensus Conference on Brain Research
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Total Number of Participants
14
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Consensus
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Primary Organizer/Manager
The Danish Board of Technology Foundation
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Budget of The Danish Board of Technology
Type of Funder
National Government
Staff
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials
Formal Evaluation
Yes

CASE

Danish Consensus Conference on Brain Research

October 22, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
September 12, 2020 Joyce Chen
September 9, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Science & Technology
Specific Topics
Biomedical Research & Development
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Denmark
Scope of Influence
National
Links
Consensus Conference on Brain Research
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Total Number of Participants
14
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Consensus
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Primary Organizer/Manager
The Danish Board of Technology Foundation
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Budget of The Danish Board of Technology
Type of Funder
National Government
Staff
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials
Formal Evaluation
Yes

In 2005, the 14 members of the Danish Consensus Conference on Brain Research met to assess how increased knowledge on the human brain can be used.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en