Data

General Issues
Transportation
Specific Topics
Transportation Planning
Mass/Public Transport
Infrastructure
Location
Brussels
Brussels
Belgium
Scope of Influence
Metropolitan Area
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
30
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
Type of Funder
Regional Government

CASE

Citizen Panel of the IRIS Plan

Brussels' Public Transport – Credit: Kevin Man/Flickr Vision
February 14, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
February 10, 2021 Antonin Lacelle-Webster
February 3, 2021 Antonin Lacelle-Webster
January 29, 2021 Antonin Lacelle-Webster
General Issues
Transportation
Specific Topics
Transportation Planning
Mass/Public Transport
Infrastructure
Location
Brussels
Brussels
Belgium
Scope of Influence
Metropolitan Area
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
30
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
Type of Funder
Regional Government
This entry was originally added in French. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

The government of the Brussels-Capital Region organized a citizens' panel in 2006 to develop its approach to updating the Regional Travel Plan (IRIS). Thirty panelists examined different options and submitted their recommendations to the government.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

http://www.crisp.be/2021/01/les-mini-publics-en-belgique-2001-2018-experiences-de-panels-citoyens-deliberatifs/

Notes

This entry is taken from the following article: Vrydagh, J., Devillers, S., Talukder, D., Jacquet, V. & Bottin, J. (2020). Les mini-publics en Belgique (2001-2018) : expériences de panels citoyens délibératifs. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, 32(32-33), 5-72. https://doi.org/10.3917/cris.2477.0005

Edit case