IntegrAzione was a deliberative process to foster integration of Roma settlements in Italy by engaging communities in policy formulation, promoting social empowerment and dialogue between communities, and changing political and personal opinions.
Problems and Purpose
IntegrAzione was established to provide citizens with information concerning developments in a Roma settlement in Italy, especially in the district of Florence. Additionally, current legislation and policies influencing the situation of the Roma population were covered. The original purpose was to decide with inhabitants on local policies concerning the Roma settlement in order to foster integration of the communities.
In order to achieve its goal, the project was structured in several phases:
- Setting up the project committee; retrieval of relevant information; building of the local supporters’ network; deciding on hypothesis and methods.
- Selection of interviewees; meeting the residents living in the area of Poderaccio; establishment of a guarantee committee; creation of promotional and communicative materials; conducting 41 face-to-face interviews; choice of locations where the questionnaires would be administered.
- Promotion of the events; processing of the questionnaires; meeting with the local social association and the Roma representatives.
- Evaluation and sharing of the questionnaires; holding four public meetings with residents.
The project started in February 2009, and ended in November of the same year.
The choice of the specific topic was determined by two main factors. First was the interest in deliberative processes and participation as a way to legitimize administrative and political choices, and as an opportunity to involve citizens in policy making. This is also connected to the participation promotion policy pursued by the Tuscany Region in accordance with the law no. 69/07, which offers financial support to such projects. On the other hand, the choice was determined by concerns about the growing xenophobia which was spreading in Italy as elsewhere.
Background History and Context
Know what events led up to this initiative? Help us complete this section!
Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities
IntegrAzione is a socially oriented project; it was promoted by local non-governmental organizations supported by citizens and local governments. Although the process involved several organizations, the primary promoter was the "Associazione di Promozione Sociale PRO.G.RE.S.S." (The Progress Association).
Participant Recruitment and Selection
In the research phase and during the public meetings, more than 500 people were involved. In addition, one can also count the participation of local associations, as well as 350 people engaged by the regional support, and the citizens contacted during the surveys, which totals almost 900 individuals involved in the project. The selection criteria for the interviewees were: the institutional or associative role played, duration of residence in the Poderaccio area, and profession. The questionnaire was randomly administered in 17 different places within the district. The result was a balance between people, those who were in favour, and those who were against the integration of the Roma people.
Participants in the public meetings were mainly stakeholders, interested in the specific issues discussed, but there were also individual citizens and Roma. Organizers tried to have a balance between those who were in favour and against the integration, and between genders (women made up most of the attendees in the research part, while men constituted the majority in the meetings; Roma women hardly took part in the process, probably due to cultural and personal reasons).
Methods and Tools Used
The method used was the Facility Interaction Model.[1] The method aims at fostering individual and group communication. Broadly speaking, its goal is to maximize the use of present human and technical resources; make the environment more comfortable; establish bonds between the population groups; and improve socialization through communication. The process does not appear to be entirely deliberative, because the discussion tackled only some topics, whereas others were not adequately developed.
What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation
In the first meeting, the attention was drawn to the situation in the local schools. A general agreement was reached on the role and importance of this issue. Such aspects as the lack of funds for connecting the village with the school (roads, buses, bus stops, etc.) and the weak integration between young Italians and Roma were highlighted. The second meeting dealt with “youth and integration”. The school administrators, and the local football trainers, who participated in this meeting, agreed on the significance of sport and on the lack of funds to integrate clubs into the Roma settlement.
During the third meeting devoted to housing, participants consisted almost entirely of people from the Roma village. The outcome was the proposal of the head of district to build public housing, i.e. small villages for a few families—houses, in which the owners share property; financial support was to be provided by the regional funding of mortgage credits on easy payment terms.
The four meetings were preparatory for the final Assembly, during the second part of which a group on “What, How, With whom, When” was proposed in order to facilitate the dialogue. The outcome was the proposal of the district president to establish a permanent working group.
Influence, Outcomes, and Effects
Taking the consistent number of participants and the fair representation of genders and ideologies into account, the project can be considered successful. The goal was to improve participation and dialogue between the neighbouring communities. Satisfaction, expressed by the participants, especially from the Roma village, and the creation of a permanent working group are evidence of the process's success.
Analysis and Lessons Learned
One positive aspect was the duration of the process that allowed sufficient time for discussion of the topic.
The ad hoc website (www.integrazioneq4.com) proved to be a useful tool both as an analogue of a travel book, and as a source of information for the citizens on the general situation of the local Roma.
Participation of associations and citizens turned out to be very positive. On the other hand, one must underline the absence of institutional representatives, with the exception of the district president.
Moreover, the funding of the Tuscany region was considered insufficient by the organizers.
See Also
The Tuscany Regional Participation Policy, Italy
References
[1] De Sario, 2007
This entry is missing citations. Please help us verify its content by adding footnotes.
[2] Official Final Report http://www.consiglio.regione.toscana.it/partecipazione/documenti/RelazioniFinali-Progetti/AssProgress-RF-IntegrAzione.pdf [DEAD LINK]
External Links
Tuscany's Regional Participatory Legislation "Legge Sulla Partecipazione"
