Data

General Issues
Environment
Specific Topics
Sustainable Development
Environmental Conservation
Location
Germany
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Public Hearings/Meetings
New Media

CASE

Mitreden-U: a Dialogue on Germany's National Sustainability Strategy

July 9, 2017 Christina Rucker
May 23, 2013 Christina Rucker
General Issues
Environment
Specific Topics
Sustainable Development
Environmental Conservation
Location
Germany
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Public Hearings/Meetings
New Media

Note: the following entry is need of assistance with content updating and editing. Please help us complete it.

Problems and Purpose

Mitreden-U provided Germany’s citizens with the possibility to influence the update of the official German sustainability policy through an online dialogue. Citizens could present ideas and suggestions about where more efforts are needed and what the politics should focus on in the next years in the field of environmental questions. Suggestions could be commented and rated on.

History

Know what events led up to this initiative? Help us complete this section!

Organizing Entities and Funding

Know who was involved in the organizing and/or funding of this initiative? Help us complete this section!

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Know how participants were recruited for this initiative? Help us complete this section!

Methods and Tools Used

Know what methods and tools were used during this initiative? Help us complete this section!

Deliberation, Decisions and Public Interaction

The project has two main elements: the online dialogue and offline meetings. After a pre-phase where mainly information about the project has been spread and the site has been advertised, the online dialogue started. From then, citizens could write down their ideas and suggestions and comment and rate the ideas of others over a four weeks period, followed by a two weeks period where they could continue to rate the suggestions received. After an evaluation period, three of the most disussed issues of the online debate (consumption, traffic and transportation; bio diversity and land use; and energy) were chosen as topics of focus meetings in Bonn and Berlin with participants of the online dialogue, representatives of issue related organisations and experts of the federal ministry of the environment. The last of the three meetings was in September 2010.

The evaluation of the submitted suggestions and comments serves as input for the ministries nomination process to the national strategy.

All participant input is transparent on the project website and was documented in a final report after the last meeting. All efforts and impact of the participation process will be announced on the website which will continue to update information on the following political process.

Influence, Outcomes and Lessons Learned

As of this entry's initial writing, all input had been analyzed and was about to be considered for the draft of the strategy paper. In addition, issues that have been much discussed in the online dialogue were deepened in three offline focus discussions with participants of the online dialogue. Special efforts were made to mobilize groups that are constantly underrepresented in participation projects: youth and migrants.

As a side effect policy procedures are more transparent to the citizens involved and the project enables them to follow-up the process.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

Want to contribute an analysis of this initiative? Help us complete this section!

External Links

Project on Zebralog's Official Website: https://www.zebralog.de/projects/archive/mitreden-u

Schulz, D., & Newig, J. (2015). Assessing Online Consultation in Participatory Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Case Study of a National Sustainability-related Consultation Platform in Germany. Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (1), 55-69.

Note

The original version of this case study first appeared on Vitalizing Democracy in 2010 and was a contestant for the 2011 Reinhard Mohn Prize. It was originally submitted by Christina Rucker.