Data

General Issues
Economics
Environment
Governance & Political Institutions
Location
Oslo
Oslo
Norway
Scope of Influence
National
Files
The Citizens Assembly for Norways future - Recommendation report
Links
Official webpage
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Did the represented group shape the agenda?
No
Total Number of Participants
66
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
Represented Group Characteristics
People within a specific jurisdiction/territory
Group without a voice (e.g., non-human beings; future generations)
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens’ Assembly
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Video Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Super-Majoritarian
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Traditional Media
Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning
No
Argument Tools
No
Facilitator Automation
Not At All
Face to Face and Online Integration
Separated
Gamification
No
Funder
European Climate Foundation, The Sunrise Project, Ragnhild and Jens Ulltveit-Moe, Værekraft Foundation
Type of Funder
Philanthropic Organization
Individual
Staff
Yes

CASE

The Norwegian Future Panel

July 1, 2026 arild.ohren
General Issues
Economics
Environment
Governance & Political Institutions
Location
Oslo
Oslo
Norway
Scope of Influence
National
Files
The Citizens Assembly for Norways future - Recommendation report
Links
Official webpage
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Did the represented group shape the agenda?
No
Total Number of Participants
66
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
Represented Group Characteristics
People within a specific jurisdiction/territory
Group without a voice (e.g., non-human beings; future generations)
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens’ Assembly
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Video Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Super-Majoritarian
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Traditional Media
Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning
No
Argument Tools
No
Facilitator Automation
Not At All
Face to Face and Online Integration
Separated
Gamification
No
Funder
European Climate Foundation, The Sunrise Project, Ragnhild and Jens Ulltveit-Moe, Værekraft Foundation
Type of Funder
Philanthropic Organization
Individual
Staff
Yes

Problems and Purpose

Norway is one of the richest countries in the world. At the same time, the world faces major problems such as climate change, loss of nature, war, and poverty. The choices Norwegians make about how national wealth is used—particularly through the Government Pension Fund Global (“Oil Fund”)—will have long‑term consequences for both current and future generations.

The core remit of Framtidspanelet was summed up in three questions:

  1. What considerations and values should guide our choices?
  2. Which problems in the world does Norway have particularly good reasons to help solve?
  3. How should the Government Pension Fund be used now and in the future?

The mission of the assembly was:

  1. To provide increased knowledge about Norway’s wealth and the global problems we face.
  2. To create recommendations on how wealth can be used to benefit the world, ourselves, and future generations.
  3. To start an open, knowledge‑based national conversation about these recommendations.
  4. To contribute to the further development of democracy in Norway

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Framtidspanelet was commissioned by seven civil society organizations:

Save the Children

Norwegian Church Aid

LNU – The Norwegian Children and Youth Council

Caritas Norway

WWF Norway

Langsikt – the think tank for long‑term policy

The Future in Our Hands

These organizations formulated the remit but had no influence on the assembly’s internal deliberations or final recommendations.

They committed to:

  1. Participate in an open event where recommendations are presented and they give feedback.
  2. Plan and organize at least three events between May and October 2025 where recommendations are presented and discussed.
  3. Create an event around the recommendations at Arendal Week 2025.
  4. Present the recommendations in at least one seminar at Parliament.
  5. Work for press coverage of the recommendations.
  6. Publish the assembly’s unedited recommendations on their own websites

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Recruitment used a two‑stage democratic lottery:

Invitations

40,000 SMS and Digipost invitations were sent to randomly selected residents aged 18 and over.

3,785 people registered interest, a relatively high response that may indicate strong engagement with the questions posed.

Youth Recruitment

31 young people aged 16–18 signed up via a separate form circulated through selected schools across the country.

Stratified Selection

A stratified selection was carried out among all registrants (including 16–18‑year‑olds).

The final assembly consisted of 66 members, selected by sex, age, region, education level, and political position (based on 2021 voting results).

Travel, food, and accommodation for the two physical meetings were covered by the organizers, removing financial barriers to participation.

Methods and Tools Used

Framtidspanelet followed OECD guidelines for citizens’ assemblies and used a mix of in‑person and digital sessions.

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Between January and April 2025, Framtidspanelet held eight working sessions, both digital and physical, designed to give members insight, reflection and time to work with dilemmas and solutions together.

14 January (digital) – Introduction to the assembly, the lottery selection, and the mandate; first reflections on Norway’s wealth and future.

1–2 February (physical) – Oslo weekend on Norway’s role in the world and ethical values; mapping dilemmas and responsibilities.

11 February (digital) – Deep dive into the Oil Fund’s history, ethics, and global influence.

6 March (digital) – Thematic group work on dilemmas, missing voices and perspectives, using lenses like responsibility, justice and solidarity.

15–16 March (physical) – Future visions and first recommendations; scenario building, group writing, and initial prioritization.

25 March (digital, open) – Public input session where preliminary recommendations were presented and guests gave feedback on each theme.

29 March (digital) – Writing workshop and prioritization, using a digital assessment round (“good as is”, “needs elaboration”, “should be cut”).

10 April (digital) – Final processing and consent; anonymous voting on all proposals, aiming for texts as many members as possible could support.

A ninth digital session on 26 August 2025 was scheduled for members to review feedback on the recommendations and agree on a joint statement to all political parties in the Norwegian Parliamen

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The final report, The Citizens’ Assembly for Norway’s Future – a voice from the citizens, contains 19 recommendations grouped into five themes:

The Oil Fund – the people’s fund – a shared responsibility

Strengthen democracy, trust, and critical thinking

Show solidarity, take global responsibility, and promote cooperation

Prioritize sustainable development

A stronger Norway

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

https://www.framtidspanelet.no/

https://www.knoca.eu/national-assemblies/norways-future-panel

References

External Links

Notes

Contributor Positionality Statements