Data

General Issues
Human Rights & Civil Rights
Governance & Political Institutions
Specific Topics
Budget - Provincial, Regional, State
Location
Łódź
Łódź Voivodeship
91
Poland
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Parent of this Case
Wenling City Deliberative Poll
Time Limited or Repeated?
Repeated over time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Involve
Total Number of Participants
100000
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Direct democracy
Public budgeting
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Manage and/or allocate money or resources
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
Voting
Primary Organizer/Manager
The Center for Deliberative Democracy at Stanford University
Type of Funder
Local Government
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in civic capacities
Changes in public policy
Changes in how institutions operate
Conflict transformation
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
Stakeholder Organizations
Elected Public Officials

CASE

Deliberative practice of Chinese local community - Dongying City ,Shandong Province

General Issues
Human Rights & Civil Rights
Governance & Political Institutions
Specific Topics
Budget - Provincial, Regional, State
Location
Łódź
Łódź Voivodeship
91
Poland
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Parent of this Case
Wenling City Deliberative Poll
Time Limited or Repeated?
Repeated over time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Involve
Total Number of Participants
100000
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Direct democracy
Public budgeting
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Manage and/or allocate money or resources
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
Voting
Primary Organizer/Manager
The Center for Deliberative Democracy at Stanford University
Type of Funder
Local Government
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in civic capacities
Changes in public policy
Changes in how institutions operate
Conflict transformation
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
Stakeholder Organizations
Elected Public Officials

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Continue Editing