CASE

Athens Democracy Forum 2018

First Submitted By Annie Pottorff

Most Recent Changes By Scott Fletcher

General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
Human Rights & Civil Rights
Media, Telecommunications & Information
Location
Athens
Greece
Scope of Influence
Multinational
Links
https://jefferson-center.org/athens-democracy-forum/
Videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syVUnWPVbEM
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Co-production in form of partnership and/or contract with private organisations
Spectrum of Public Participation
Involve
Total Number of Participants
200
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
not
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Traditional Media
Primary Organizer/Manager
Jefferson Center
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
New York Times Athens Democracy Forum
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior

Attendees at the 2018 Athens Democracy Forum had the opportunity to collaborate and craft concrete, creative, and actionable solutions to strengthen democracy through a shortened Citizens Jury-style process led by the Jefferson Center.

Problems and Purpose

The Athens Democracy Forum is a yearly event bringing together journalists with business leaders, policy makers, and experts from around the world to discuss the state of democracy with a focus on solutions.

At the 2018 Forum, the challenges to democracy were clear against a backdrop of dropping trust in the media, partisan polarization, influence of money and special interests in politics, and much more. The Jefferson Center partnered with the Times at the Forum, where they invited all attendees to propose new ideas, insights, and solutions to the four major themes of the conference: the rule of law; identity, diversity and inclusion; the role of technology; and the responsibility of business.

Background History and Context

The New York Times has joined with the City of Athens and the United Nations to co-host the Athens Democracy Forum every year since 2012.

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

The Jefferson Center led the Citizens Juries, and was assisted by facilitators from Involve, Missions Publiques, and the RSA.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Know how participants were recruited? Help us complete this section!

Methods and Tools Used

Following presentations by speakers, delegates were asked to participate in shortened, Citizens Jury-style workshops corresponding to these four themes. Although Citizens Juries typically last for multiple days, the process was condensed for the Forum, with the goal of giving attendees the chance to collaborate and craft concrete, creative, and actionable solutions to strengthen democracy. 

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

During registration, delegates had the chance to choose which workshop topic they wanted to explore further. After a brief introduction to how deliberation works, delegates, joined by columnists of The Times and members of the editorial board, were asked:

“What new ideas, insights, or solutions do you have for strengthening or advancing democracy based on what you have learned at the Athens Democracy Forum?”

They individually recorded their initial ideas on notecards, and then shared their thoughts, including challenges and corresponding solutions, in small groups. Delegates discussed the common themes that emerged among their groups, as well as any differences. Tables then collectively deliberated about, determined, and re-worked the solutions that they believed reflected the most promising ideas. Finally, groups shared two or three of these promising solutions with the entire room.

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Their recommendations informed the “Talk with The Times” session the next day at the Forum, where senior Times journalists and editors assessed the findings and provided their own outlook on the state of democracy.

The incorporation of deliberation into the Athens Democracy Forum program is an important opportunity for democracy today: making a space for delegates to meaningfully discuss the themes highlights the Forum’s recognition of expertise not only among the usual experts, but the broader audience of Forum attendees. These deliberative workshops enabled attendees to encounter alternate points of view, identify shared values, and find common ground. Instead of only listening to presentations and panels, they had the unique chance to dig deeper, and meaningfully engage with what they had heard to create a unique set of solutions to strengthen democracy.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

Want to contribute an analysis of this initiative? Help us complete this section!

See Also

References

External Links

Athens Democracy Forum official website

Notes

Edit case