Data

General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
Repeated over time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Research
Approach
Evaluation, oversight, & social auditing
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Captive Sample
Targeted Demographics
Elected Public Officials
General Types of Methods
Evaluation, oversight, and social auditing
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Online Consultations
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Ask & Answer Questions
Formal Testimony
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
New Media
Primary Organizer/Manager
The Government of the United Kingdom
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Funder
The Government of the United Kingdom
Type of Funder
National Government
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in civic capacities
Changes in how institutions operate
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
Elected Public Officials
Appointed Public Servants
Formal Evaluation
Yes
Evaluation Report Links
UK Parliament Evidence Checks
Show your workings: Assessing how government uses evidence to make policy

CASE

Citizens Fact Check the UK Parliament

Evidence Check Web forum – Credit: Parliament.uk
September 6, 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
Repeated over time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Research
Approach
Evaluation, oversight, & social auditing
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Captive Sample
Targeted Demographics
Elected Public Officials
General Types of Methods
Evaluation, oversight, and social auditing
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Online Consultations
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Ask & Answer Questions
Formal Testimony
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
New Media
Primary Organizer/Manager
The Government of the United Kingdom
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Funder
The Government of the United Kingdom
Type of Funder
National Government
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in civic capacities
Changes in how institutions operate
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
Elected Public Officials
Appointed Public Servants
Formal Evaluation
Yes
Evaluation Report Links
UK Parliament Evidence Checks
Show your workings: Assessing how government uses evidence to make policy
This entry was originally added in English. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

The UK Parliament Select Committees’ Evidence Checks invite citizens to scrutinise the evidence which underpins Government policy in specific areas, to determine how robust that evidence is, and to highlight where the gaps are.


Note: the following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it.


Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Edit case