Data

General Issues
Social Welfare
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Child Care
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Vorarlberg
Austria
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
Children in the middle: recommendations for a child-friendly Vorarlberg
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Social mobilization
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
75
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Panel Discussion
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Traditional Media
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
For-Profit Business
Funder
Budget of the Office for Future Issues Office of the Voralberg state government
Type of Funder
Regional Government

CASE

Citizens' Panel on Child-Friendly Vorarlberg

"Kinder in die Mitte"
August 12, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
August 6, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Social Welfare
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Child Care
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Vorarlberg
Austria
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
Children in the middle: recommendations for a child-friendly Vorarlberg
OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Social mobilization
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
75
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Panel Discussion
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Traditional Media
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
For-Profit Business
Funder
Budget of the Office for Future Issues Office of the Voralberg state government
Type of Funder
Regional Government
This entry was originally added in English. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

In 2005, the 75 members of the Citizens' Panel on Child-Friendly Vorarlberg convened to produce recommendations for state policy in the areas of parenting skills, family networks, compatibility of family and work, and child care.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en. 

Edit case