en

Quick Submit

Data

General Issues: Economics

Specific Topics: Government Spending; Budget - National

Collections: OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes

Location

South Korea

Scope of Influence: National

Links: OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation; Korean Center for Social Conflict Resolution: Highlighted Projects

Ongoing: No

Time Limited or Repeated?: A single, defined period of time

Purpose/Goal: Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies; Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations

Approach: Co-governance

Spectrum of Public Participation: Collaborate

Total Number of Participants: 300

Open to All or Limited to Some?: Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals

Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population: Stratified Random Sample

General Types of Methods: Deliberative and dialogic process; Public budgeting

General Types of Tools/Techniques: Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation; Recruit or select participants; Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations

Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques: Deliberation; Workshop; Online Deliberation; Participatory Budgeting

Legality: Yes

Facilitators: Yes

Face-to-Face, Online, or Both: Both

Types of Interaction Among Participants: Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation; Ask & Answer Questions; Express Opinions/Preferences Only

Information & Learning Resources: Written Briefing Materials; Expert Presentations; Teach-ins

Decision Methods: Opinion Survey

Type of Organizer/Manager: Non-Governmental Organization; National Government

Funder: Ministry of Finance

Type of Funder: National Government

Evidence of Impact: Yes

Types of Change: Changes in public policy; Changes in how institutions operate

Implementers of Change: Elected Public Officials

CASE

South Korean Citizens' Budget Participating Group

Project on Citizens` Participatory Budgeting System and Citizens' Budget Participating Group (2018) – Credit: Korean Center for Social Conflict Resolution

Wiki Contributor History

August 26, 2020	Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
August 25, 2020	Joyce Chen

Case Data

General Issues: Economics

Specific Topics: Government Spending; Budget - National

Collections: OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes

Location

South Korea

Scope of Influence: National

Links: OECD Project Page for Innovative Citizen Participation; Korean Center for Social Conflict Resolution: Highlighted Projects

Ongoing: No

Time Limited or Repeated?: A single, defined period of time

Purpose/Goal: Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies; Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations

Approach: Co-governance

Spectrum of Public Participation: Collaborate

Total Number of Participants: 300

Open to All or Limited to Some?: Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals

Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population: Stratified Random Sample

General Types of Methods: Deliberative and dialogic process; Public budgeting

General Types of Tools/Techniques: Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation; Recruit or select participants; Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations

Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques: Deliberation; Workshop; Online Deliberation; Participatory Budgeting

Legality: Yes

Facilitators: Yes

Face-to-Face, Online, or Both: Both

Types of Interaction Among Participants: Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation; Ask & Answer Questions; Express Opinions/Preferences Only

Information & Learning Resources: Written Briefing Materials; Expert Presentations; Teach-ins

Decision Methods: Opinion Survey

Type of Organizer/Manager: Non-Governmental Organization; National Government

Funder: Ministry of Finance

Type of Funder: National Government

Evidence of Impact: Yes

Types of Change: Changes in public policy; Changes in how institutions operate

Implementers of Change: Elected Public Officials

This entry was originally added in English. View this entry in its original language.

The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it.

In 2018, the 300 members of the Citizens' Budget Participating Group met to provide feedback on how 68 million dollars should be spent with regards to public enterprises.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.