Data

General Issues
Health
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Your health, your care, your say - Research report
Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
1240
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Sortition
Civic Lottery
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
Voting
Opinion Survey
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Public Hearings/Meetings
Traditional Media
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Type of Funder
National Government
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials
Lay Public

CASE

Mini-Public in the UK: Your Health, Your Care, Your Say

April 8, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
March 24, 2021 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Health
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Your health, your care, your say - Research report
Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
1240
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Sortition
Civic Lottery
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
Voting
Opinion Survey
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Public Hearings/Meetings
Traditional Media
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Type of Funder
National Government
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials
Lay Public

In 2005, the UK Department of Health commissioned a national “listening exercise” about the National Health Service called “Your health, your care, your say." 4 regional events with 50–100 people took place, after which a 986-person “National Citizen’s Summit” was held.

Problems and Purpose

The “Your health, your care, your say” event was designed to give citizens a chance to bring up issues and suggestions about the National Health Service that they thought were important. It also allowed them to create some concrete goals for service expectations.

Background History and Context

Know what events led up to this initiative? Help us complete this section!

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Opinion Leader Research (OLR) was commissioned by the Department of Health to conduct the national “listening exercise”.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Four regional events were held, each attended by 50-100 randomly selected people from among the 25,000 that were originally contacted and surveyed.

Methods and Tools Used

Deliberation

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Four regional events were held, where participants were broken into groups of 10 members with a facilitator to spend a day discussing the questions and ideas that were set out. At the end of the day, the groups would convene to talk with each other and present finding to government ministers that were present. After the regional meetings, a “National Citizen’s Summit” was held, with 986 people from around the nation participating. There was a reconvened event in London in March 2006, attended by 110 people who had already attended previous events. The four regional events were in Gateshead, Leicester, London and Plymouth, the national summit was in Birmingham. Alongside these mini-publics, 29,808 people completed the self-completion online and paper-based core questionnaire and 8,460 people took part in ‘local listening exercises.’

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The summit was televised live and the results were written into a “white paper” called “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say” in 2006. A follow up event, “Holding the Government to Account” was held with 120 of the original participants in the summit. At this event, people who had been at previous deliberative events heard the Secretary of State for Health, alongside two Ministers from health and social care, report back to them on what had been taken forward from the YHYCYS exercise into the White Paper, and asking for feedback on the participants’ satisfaction with what had been done with their input.

A year after the “Holding” event, Opinion Leader Research held a half day event that allowed 84 of the original participants to review the suggestions put forth by the white paper, and what success these had. Questioning of the participants showed great variation in what people remembered, and people’s opinions on what changes, if any, had been seen in the health care system. The Secretary of State and the National Director of primary care were present and able to act as witnesses, explaining what progress had been made and what still needed to be done.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

It is difficult to gauge the direct effects of the event. While a white paper was published, the degree to which the summit’s findings were applied in the day-to-day experience in the NHS system remains unclear.

See Also

References

[1] Paulis, Emilien; Pilet, Jean-Benoit; Panel, Sophie; Vittori, Davide; Close, Caroline, 2020, "POLITICIZE Dataset", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7X6GT, Harvard Dataverse, V1

External Links

Notes

This entry is based on the POLITICIZE dataset. More information can be found at the following links:

  • Paulis, Emilien; Pilet, Jean-Benoit; Panel, Sophie; Vittori, Davide; Close, Caroline, 2020, "POLITICIZE Dataset", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7X6GT, Harvard Dataverse, V1
  • Pilet J-B, Paulis E, Panel S., Vitori D & Close C. 202X The POLITICIZE Dataset: an inventory of Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science.