Data

General Issues
Health
Specific Topics
Health Care Reform
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Parent of this Case
Gordon Brown’s Citizens’ Juries in the UK: Children & Families
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Citizens’ Juries
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
175
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Sortition
Civic Lottery
Deliberative Forum
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Funder
National Government

CASE

Gordon Brown’s Citizens’ Juries in the UK: National Health Service

April 8, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
March 24, 2021 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Health
Specific Topics
Health Care Reform
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Parent of this Case
Gordon Brown’s Citizens’ Juries in the UK: Children & Families
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Citizens’ Juries
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
175
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Sortition
Civic Lottery
Deliberative Forum
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Funder
National Government

This Citizens' Jury on the National Health Service was part of UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown's proposal for the use of citizens' juries. 9 NHS citizens' juries took place in 2007, organized simultaneously and connected via livestream.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

In a speech on September 3, 2007, Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced his proposal for an immediate use of citizens' juries. Various were organized by Opinion Leader Research, in different locations and on different issues. Five citizens’ juries were conducted by the Department for Children, Schools and Families. The first jury met in Bristol on 6 September 2007 at a cost of £57,074.25 Citizens juries also have been held in London, Leeds, Portsmouth, and Birmingham. The cost of these four juries totalled £467,704. All five events were organised by Opinion Leader Research. The Department have stated that these events “took the form of deliberative forums”.

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Opinion Leader Research was hired to set up and run the juries.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

The jury was composed of a small number of citizens (around 20) selected by a stratified random selection process to ensure a diversity of demographic criteria (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity, etc.). It also comprised patients and professionals of the health sector.

Methods and Tools Used

Citizens' Jury

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

The jury gathered to deliberate over one day. Citizens heard evidence, cross-examined selected experts and deliberated on the question(s). At the end of the process, citizens produced recommendations in the form of a report; the sponsoring body (e.g. the public authority) was expected to respond to the recommendations.

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

It is not clear how the recommendations or learnings were transmitted to decision makers. Some critics suggested that the juries were merely a publicity stunt; however Brown, disagreed, noting that his views had been swayed on several issues due to the recommendations. Though PM Brown claimed the citizens' juries influenced his decisions, there is nothing to show that this translated into any legislation that was passed.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

Gordon Brown’s Citizens’ Juries in the UK: Children & Families

Gordon Brown’s Citizens’ Juries in the UK: Crime

References

External Links

Notes

This entry is based on the POLITICIZE dataset. More information can be found at the following links:

  • Paulis, Emilien; Pilet, Jean-Benoit; Panel, Sophie; Vittori, Davide; Close, Caroline, 2020, "POLITICIZE Dataset", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7X6GT, Harvard Dataverse, V1
  • Pilet J-B, Paulis E, Panel S., Vitori D & Close C. 202X. The POLITICIZE Dataset: an inventory of Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science.