Data

General Issues
Education
Specific Topics
Elementary & Secondary Education
Location
Flanders
Belgium
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Files
2016_Advies van het ouderpanel_Eindrapport-1.pdf
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
24
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
If Voting
Unanimous Decision
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Regional Government
Philanthropic Organization
For-Profit Business
Funder
Le Ministère de l'enseignement de l'Autorité flamande
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Staff
Yes

CASE

Deliberative Panel on Secondary Education Reform in Flanders

2015 - ouderpanel.png
2015 - Ouderpanel 2.png
April 9, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
March 30, 2021 julien.vrydagh
General Issues
Education
Specific Topics
Elementary & Secondary Education
Location
Flanders
Belgium
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Files
2016_Advies van het ouderpanel_Eindrapport-1.pdf
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
24
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
If Voting
Unanimous Decision
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Regional Government
Philanthropic Organization
For-Profit Business
Funder
Le Ministère de l'enseignement de l'Autorité flamande
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Staff
Yes
This entry was originally added in French. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

The Flemish Minister of Education is organizing a deliberative panel over three weekends to consult 24 citizens drawn by lot on the reform of secondary education then underway in Flanders.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

Citizen Debate on Educational Reform in French-speaking Belgium

References

External Links

Notes

This entry comes from the following publication: Vrydagh, J., Devillers, S., Talukder, D., Jacquet, V. & Bottin, J. (2020). Les mini-publics en Belgique (2001-2018) : expériences de panels citoyens délibératifs. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, 32(32-33), 5-72. https://doi.org/10.3917/cris.2477.0005

Edit case