Data

General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
International Affairs
Specific Topics
Regional & Global Governance
Location
Wallonie
Belgique
Scope of Influence
Regional
Files
Participation citoyenne au cœur du Parlement
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
89
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All With Special Effort to Recruit Some Groups
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Trained, Nonprofessional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Type of Organizer/Manager
Regional Government
Academic Institution
For-Profit Business
Funder
Le Parlement de la Communauté française
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Staff
Yes

CASE

“Quelle Europe pour demain ?": Deliberative Panel in Belgium on the EU

April 17, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
March 30, 2021 julien.vrydagh
General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
International Affairs
Specific Topics
Regional & Global Governance
Location
Wallonie
Belgique
Scope of Influence
Regional
Files
Participation citoyenne au cœur du Parlement
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
89
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All With Special Effort to Recruit Some Groups
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Trained, Nonprofessional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Type of Organizer/Manager
Regional Government
Academic Institution
For-Profit Business
Funder
Le Parlement de la Communauté française
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Staff
Yes

The Parliament of the French Community of Belgium organized a two-day deliberative panel with 89 people to raise awareness and consult citizens on the European Union.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

The full version of this text was originally published in French in the le Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP (www.crisp.be) and is available online at CAIRN https://www.cairn.info/revue-courrier-hewee- by-du- crisp-2020-32-page-5.htm

Source: Vrydagh, J., Devillers, S., Talukder, D., Jacquet, V., & Bottin, J. (2021).Les mini-publics en Belgique (2000-2018) : expériences de panels citoyens délibératifs. Courrier Hebdomadaire du Centre de Recherche et d’Information socio-politiques.