Data

General Issues
Science & Technology
International Affairs
Scope of Influence
No Geographical Limits
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
General Types of Methods
Public budgeting
Evaluation, oversight, and social auditing
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Negotiation & Bargaining
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
No Information Was Provided to Participants
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
New Media
Funder
Investors to The DAO
Type of Funder
Social Movement
Community Based Organization
Staff
No
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes

CASE

The DAO Hack

April 13, 2021 Patrick L Scully, Participedia Team
April 7, 2021 joshua.z.tan
General Issues
Science & Technology
International Affairs
Scope of Influence
No Geographical Limits
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
General Types of Methods
Public budgeting
Evaluation, oversight, and social auditing
Facilitators
No
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Negotiation & Bargaining
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
No Information Was Provided to Participants
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
New Media
Funder
Investors to The DAO
Type of Funder
Social Movement
Community Based Organization
Staff
No
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes

The most famous attack on any blockchain project. The DAO hack was a re-entrancy attack on one of the earliest Decentralised Autonomous Organisations.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

The DAO was probably the earliest DeFi project and its spectacular failure likely delayed the development of DeFi. The DAO pursued an automated investing strategy and had a decentralised system of governance.


Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

The DAO's smart contracts were vulnerable to a re-entrancy attack and this vulnerability was used to drain $60 million worth of ETH from the fund. This was about 40% of the total funds they had raised.

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The magnitude of the hack made it a crisis for Ethereum and resulted in a hard fork of the Ethereum chain, to recover the lost funds. This was controversial within the Ethereum community and those who were opposed to the fork maintained Ethereum Classic as the continuation of the original Ethereum chain.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes