Data

General Issues
Science & Technology
Location
Belgique
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
32
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Hearings/Meetings
Type of Organizer/Manager
Academic Institution
Type of Funder
National Government
Staff
Yes
Formal Evaluation
Yes

CASE

My DNA: all concerned (Belgium)

May 3, 2021 Antonin Lacelle-Webster
General Issues
Science & Technology
Location
Belgique
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
32
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Hearings/Meetings
Type of Organizer/Manager
Academic Institution
Type of Funder
National Government
Staff
Yes
Formal Evaluation
Yes
This entry was originally added in French. View this entry in its original language. click for more info
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

Problems and objectives

History and background

Organizing, supporting and financing organizations

Recruitment and selection of participants

Methods and tools used

What happened: process, interactions and participation

Influence, results and effects

Analysis and lessons learned

See as well

References

external links

Notes

The full version of this text was originally published in French in the weekly Courrier du CRISP (www.crisp.be) and is available online at CAIRN https://www.cairn.info/revue-courrier-he Weekly-du- crisp-2020-32-page-5.htm

Source: Vrydagh, J., Devillers, S., Talukder, D., Jacquet, V., & Bottin, J. (2021). Mini-publics in Belgium (2000-2018): experiences of deliberative citizen panels. Weekly mail from the Center for Socio-political Research and Information.


Edit case