Data

Location
Wallonie
Belgique
Scope of Influence
Regional
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Civil society building
Co-governance
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
30
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
Targeted Demographics
Youth
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Academic Institution
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Staff
Yes

CASE

Citizen panel on young people in Wallonia (Namur, Belgium)

Location
Wallonie
Belgique
Scope of Influence
Regional
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Civil society building
Co-governance
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
30
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
Targeted Demographics
Youth
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Academic Institution
Type of Funder
Regional Government
Staff
Yes

Problems and objectives

History and background

Organizing, supporting and financing organizations

Recruitment and selection of participants

Methods and tools used

What happened: process, interactions and participation

Influence, results and effects

Analysis and lessons learned

See as well

References

external links

Notes

The full version of this text was originally published in French in the weekly Courrier du CRISP (www.crisp.be) and is available online at CAIRN https://www.cairn.info/revue-courrier-he Weekly-du- crisp-2020-32-page-5.htm

Source: Vrydagh, J., Devillers, S., Talukder, D., Jacquet, V., & Bottin, J. (2021). Mini-publics in Belgium (2000-2018): experiences of deliberative citizen panels. Weekly mail from the Center for Socio-political Research and Information.