Data

General Issues
Arts, Culture, & Recreation
Identity & Diversity
Social Welfare
Specific Topics
Budget - Local
Citizenship & Role of Citizens
Location
Manchester
England
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
Neighbourhood
Files
Consent form .pdf
Interview transcript.docx
Links
Evaluation and reflection report on Choose for Cheetham 2025
Videos
Overview of youth voting day
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
If Repeated: Representation Change - Who?
Do not know
If Repeated: Representation Change - What?
Do not know
Purpose/Goal
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Deliver goods & services
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Citizenship building
Co-governance
Social mobilization
Spectrum of Public Participation
Empower
Did the represented group shape the agenda?
Yes
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Targeted Demographics
Youth
Represented Group Characteristics
Group without a voice (e.g., non-human beings; future generations)
People within a specific jurisdiction/territory
Represented Group
Youth
Children
General Types of Methods
Public budgeting
Deliberative and dialogic process
Community development, organizing, and mobilization
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Manage and/or allocate money or resources
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Social Media
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Preferential Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
New Media
Facilitator Automation
Not At All
Face to Face and Online Integration
Together Synchronously
Visualization
No
Virtual Reality
No
Representation Claims Made
New Media (social media, blogging, texting)
Word of Mouth
Official Communication
Feedback Methods
Digital Engagement
Others
Type of Organizer/Manager
Community Based Organization
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Outcome or Impact Achieved
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in how institutions operate
Changes in civic capacities
Implementers of Change
Stakeholder Organizations
Most Affected
They were perfectly represented in the process
Implementers Connected
Do not know
Formal Evaluation
Yes
Represented Group in Evaluation
Do not know
Evaluation Report Links
https://sharedfuturecic.org.uk/reports/choose-for-cheetham-youth-participatory-budgeting/

CASE

Choose for Cheetham Youth Participatory Budgeting 2025

May 14, 2026 sm3n24
May 14, 2026 mb27g23
May 13, 2026 mb27g23
May 12, 2026 mb27g23
May 1, 2026 mb27g23
April 28, 2026 mb27g23
General Issues
Arts, Culture, & Recreation
Identity & Diversity
Social Welfare
Specific Topics
Budget - Local
Citizenship & Role of Citizens
Location
Manchester
England
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
Neighbourhood
Files
Consent form .pdf
Interview transcript.docx
Links
Evaluation and reflection report on Choose for Cheetham 2025
Videos
Overview of youth voting day
Start Date
End Date
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
If Repeated: Representation Change - Who?
Do not know
If Repeated: Representation Change - What?
Do not know
Purpose/Goal
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Deliver goods & services
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Citizenship building
Co-governance
Social mobilization
Spectrum of Public Participation
Empower
Did the represented group shape the agenda?
Yes
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Targeted Demographics
Youth
Represented Group Characteristics
Group without a voice (e.g., non-human beings; future generations)
People within a specific jurisdiction/territory
Represented Group
Youth
Children
General Types of Methods
Public budgeting
Deliberative and dialogic process
Community development, organizing, and mobilization
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Manage and/or allocate money or resources
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Social Media
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Preferential Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
New Media
Facilitator Automation
Not At All
Face to Face and Online Integration
Together Synchronously
Visualization
No
Virtual Reality
No
Representation Claims Made
New Media (social media, blogging, texting)
Word of Mouth
Official Communication
Feedback Methods
Digital Engagement
Others
Type of Organizer/Manager
Community Based Organization
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Outcome or Impact Achieved
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in how institutions operate
Changes in civic capacities
Implementers of Change
Stakeholder Organizations
Most Affected
They were perfectly represented in the process
Implementers Connected
Do not know
Formal Evaluation
Yes
Represented Group in Evaluation
Do not know
Evaluation Report Links
https://sharedfuturecic.org.uk/reports/choose-for-cheetham-youth-participatory-budgeting/

Problems and Purpose

The “Choose for Cheetham” initiative was implemented to address inequalities affecting young people in Cheetham Hill, Manchester, including limited opportunities, safety concerns, and a lack of influence over local funding decisions. Traditional grant-making processes were often criticised for cultural biases, ‘elite capture’, favouritism and a lack of transparency [3]. In response to these criticisms, Hope for Cheetham implemented youth-led participatory budgeting to ensure a more democratic and fairer allocation of investment funds. Its purpose was to empower children and young people to achieve their ambitions through voting on and seeing community-led projects implemented in Cheetham Hill. This initiative resulted in over £200,000 distributed to youth-focused social action, play services, mentoring and wellbeing projects to become implemented [3].

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

The Hope for Cheetham steering group acted as the lead organising entity, overseeing the overall direction of the project. Having previously distributed funding only among existing member organisations, the steering group recognised that this approach excluded new organisations and lacked meaningful youth involvement, leading them to adopt PB as a more democratic alternative. In January 2025, the steering group met formally to agree on the structure of the voting events, how votes would be combined and weighted, and what would constitute a successful outcome [2]. The initiative was also supported by Young Manchester, who played a key role in coordinating and facilitating youth participation throughout the project [2]. Additional expert support was also provided by Shared Future, who specialise in setting up participatory budgeting programmes and were commissioned to assist with design aspects of the process. Shared Future developed templates and guidance materials to support smooth delivery and produced an evaluation report which assessed the effectiveness and outcomes of the initiative [2].

Funding for the initiative was provided by the Youth Endowment Fund and the #iwill fund, which enabled the allocation of over £200,000 to community-led projects and activities for young people in Cheetham Hill [3].

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

Contributor Positionality Statements