Data

Links
http://sustaineddialogue.org/our-approach/
Facilitation
No
Scope of Implementation
name:scope_of_influence-key:local
Level of Polarization This Method Can Handle
name:level_polarization-key:high_polarization

METHOD

Sustained Dialogue

First Submitted By Scott Fletcher, Participedia Team

Most Recent Changes By Jaskiran Gakhal

Links
http://sustaineddialogue.org/our-approach/
Facilitation
No
Scope of Implementation
name:scope_of_influence-key:local
Level of Polarization This Method Can Handle
name:level_polarization-key:high_polarization

Sustained dialogue is a technique that focuses on effecting change over a long period of time by transforming conflictual relationships.

Note: the following entry is incomplete. You can help Participedia by adding to it.

Problems and Purpose

Sustained Dialogue is defined as a 'changemaking process' which

  1. "Focuses on transforming relationships that cause problems, create conflict, and block change; and
  2. Emphasizes the importance of effective change over time" [1]

Origins and Development

Know how and why this tool/technique was developed? Help us complete this section!

How it Works

Sustained Dialogue develops over a five-step process:

1. "The 'Who': Deciding to Engage - like the first step in any meaningful dialogue, those living with systemic civic challenges decide to improve community relations through dialogue. 

2. "The 'What': Mapping and Naming" - participants come together to map and name challenges to and inside their community. The initial interactions during this stage are generally unstructured; participants have not yet developed trust between one another so often take this time to 'vent' grievances. The stage is complete when the group agrees on what needs to be focused on. 

3. "The 'Why': Probing Problems and Relationships - this stage follows four steps thorugh which the specific systems and dynamics at the root of community challenges are probed and uncovered:

3.1. "Define the most pressing problems

3.2. Identify possible ways to change them

3.3. Come to a sense of direction

3.4. Weigh the consequences of moving in that direction against the consequences of doing nothing" [2]

4. "The 'How': Scenario building" - having identified the most pressing problems, participants envision a way to change and/or improve relationships and ongoing engagement. Five questions help guide the design process:

4.1. "What resources do we have?

4.2. What are the obstacles?

4.3. What steps could overcome those obstacles?

4.4. Who could take those steps?

4.5. How can we sequence those steps so that they build on another to generate momentum behind the plan?" [3]

5. "The 'Now': Individual and Collective Action" - having constructed a theoretical solution, participants now make plans for concrete actions that "can be collective or individual, involve outsiders to the dialogue group, center on creating awareness, engage administrators or faculty, etc." [4]

Analysis and Lessons Learned

Want to contribute an analysis of this tool/technique? Help us complete this section!

See Also

Sustained Dialogue Institute 

References

[1] http://sustaineddialogue.org/our-approach/

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

External Links

http://sustaineddialogue.org/our-approach/

Sustained Dialogue and Public Deliberation The Role of Public Conversation in a Growing Civil Society and Commons  

Resolving Community Conflicts and Problems: Public Deliberation and Sustained Dialogue 

Dialogue and interethnic trust: A randomized field trial of ‘sustained dialogue’ in Ethiopia Abstract 

Notes

Lead Image: Sustained Dialogue http://tinyurl.com/y4o8uzn6