Data

General Issues
Economics
Specific Topics
Budget - Local
Location
Atibaia
São Paulo
Brazil
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
População este se preparando para o Orçamento Participativo
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Collaborate
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
General Types of Methods
Public budgeting
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Manage and/or allocate money or resources
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Participatory Budgeting
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Listen/Watch as Spectator
Information & Learning Resources
Participant Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Preferential Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Public Hearings/Meetings
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Type of Funder
Local Government
Volunteers
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials

CASE

2010 Participatory Budgeting in Atibaia, Brazil

August 16, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
December 13, 2018 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
October 17, 2017 sarahkcp
February 16, 2014 sarahkcp
General Issues
Economics
Specific Topics
Budget - Local
Location
Atibaia
São Paulo
Brazil
Scope of Influence
City/Town
Links
População este se preparando para o Orçamento Participativo
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Co-governance
Spectrum of Public Participation
Collaborate
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All
General Types of Methods
Public budgeting
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Manage and/or allocate money or resources
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Participatory Budgeting
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Express Opinions/Preferences Only
Listen/Watch as Spectator
Information & Learning Resources
Participant Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Preferential Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Public Hearings/Meetings
Type of Organizer/Manager
Local Government
Type of Funder
Local Government
Volunteers
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials

In 2010, a participatory budgeting project was undertaken in Atibaia, one of many Brazilian cities to engage in this democratic initiative in order to increase citizen engagement on issues affecting their communities.

Problems and Purpose

The goal of the process in Atibaia, Brazil is to involve citizens in decisions about how to use the municipal budget, teaching them how to use the government machinery, seeking the widest possible participation of residents in deciding the priorities of the municipality. Participatory budgeting is based on the fact that the residents themselves know best what is needed in their neighbourhoods and regions.

Background History and Context

Atibaia is a municipality located in the state of São Paulo in Brazil. Since 1993, it has been implementing a Participatory Budgeting (Orçamento Participativo, or OP) process based on the model used in Porto Alegre in 1989

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities 

The 2010 Participatory Budgeting of the city of Atibaia is promoted by the municipality itself and encourages popular participation in the process of deciding the best allocation of available resources for public works such as the construction or renovation of schools, health centres, roads, among other things.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

The entire population of Atibaia above 16 years of age may participate in meetings and vote. For this, a photo id and a proof of residency must be presented prior to the meeting.

Methods and Tools Used

This initiative is an example of participatory budgeting, an increasingly common method of democratic innovation broadly described as "a decision-making process through which citizens deliberate and negotiate over the distribution of public resources." There are many benefits associated with participatory budgeting including increased civic and democratic education; increased government transparency; and an increased opportunity for participation by historically marginalized populations[1].

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

To enable the execution of the Participatory Budget, Atibaia was divided into 10 regions, each consisting of several neighbourhoods. The City Hall designates for each region a certain percentage of the budget according to the population density, geographical extension and social needs.

Every year, preparatory meetings are carried out in each neighbourhood in order to explain the methodology of the PB to the representatives of the communities and the population, so that each resident can be an informed participant during the Participatory Budgeting process. A representative of the region is chosen by residents, and she/he collects requests from residents of works deemed necessary. These requests are voted by residents themselves in an assembly. The final selection of the elected neighbourhood priorities will be included in the minutes of the assembly and forwarded to the city council. This final minutes shall be signed by at least 20 people who attended the assembly and must include their personal data.

The city gathers the minutes of all regions, assesses the feasibility of each proposal (referred to as demands) in terms of competence (if it is up to the municipality, the state or the federal government, for only the projects that fall under the jurisdiction of the municipality can be carried out), financial feasibility (if there are enough resources for the project), technicality (if it is a priority for the region) and legality (if there are no legal impediments to the implementation of the demand).

Each region elects its delegate or delegates (the number should be proportional to the number of people present at the meetings) to participate in the Regional Forum. In general, delegates are usually known in their communities due to prior involvement in matters that affect their neighbourhoods. These delegates also act as supervisors of the construction progress. They are volunteers and therefore do not receive any income for these activities.

The process of joint decision-making strategies on the improvement and development of neighbourhoods and regions aims at creating a sense of community among residents and overcoming localisms through contact with residents of other neighbourhoods. During the discussions about what should be done, it is expected that neighbors become familiar with the problems of others and create a vision of the city and its problems that go beyond their own surroundings.

During the last Participatory Budgeting process of Atibaia, the demands of the residents have been concentrated in the areas of infrastructure such as paving, drainage, lighting, improvements in schools and health centres, and the construction of sports fields. [2]

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

  • Total taxes collected by the city of Atibaia in 2010 : R $ 221,500,000.00
  • Total allocated by the city of Atibaia for the Participatory Budget: R $ 9,000,000.00 [2]
  • Of the 20,000 inhabitants of Atibaia, 3,606 participated in this process [2]
  • PB 2010: 48 of the 130 approved facilities in the process of OP were executed until now (Sep 2013).

The number of people participating in the BP of Atibaia gradually increases every year and the methods used to inform and engage citizens as well as the technology used for the counting of votes significantly improved since the process began in 1993.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

With the passage of time and the increased experience with Participatory Budgeting, problems have been identified but not necessarily addressed. One such problem is that the priorities of the projects depend on who attends the meetings. For example, Manha (2011) cites an assembly of one of the regions which voted to build a BMX track instead of expanding the Technical School Centro Paula Souza, which would benefit a lot more people. This happened simply because those who wanted the track appeared in bigger numbers. Manha does not discount the effects of propaganda, besides the fact that neighbourhoods with higher population densities have the power to impose their projects on smaller neighbourhoods within a given region.[3] However, even when approved, the demands suffer due to lack of professionals in the city hall to design the projects, which ultimately delays the delivery of the works.[3]

A second major problem is the communication between the city hall and residents. Residents complain that the city does not contribute to the dissemination of information about the Participatory Budget. The posting of meeting dates exclusively in the city hall website excludes many residents who do not have internet access or do not come across the information so easily. It is up to the residents to disseminate information about the Participatory Budgeting throughout their regions, having to pay out of their own pockets for the advertising of activities. According to Manha, the communication strategy of the city has proved inefficient in attracting more residents to participate in the PB.[3] The mere disclosure of dates and preparatory courses has not been sufficient to answer questions about what is PB and its limits. Residents complain that they feel discouraged when what they vote as a priority is not executed by the city.

The city hall, on the other hand, realizes that Participatory Budgeting has failed to achieve one of its main goals: overcoming localisms. Residents compete for benefits, failing to see the PB as a collective good. The lack of a sense of community within regions leads many residents to not take part in the proceedings of the PB for finding it a populist instrument, in which the city seeks to benefit only the poorest neighbourhoods. The OP is not seen as a democratic tool and in general, the population does not see citizen participation as a viable or desirable.[3]

See Also

Participatory Budgeting  

Participatory Budgeting: Porto Alegre 2005-2007 

Participatory Budgeting in Araras, São Paulo, Brazil  

References

[2] Assessoria de Imprensa Prefeitura de Atibaia (2010). Population is already preparing for Participatory Budgeting. Atibia.com.br. Retrieved from http://www.atibaia.com.br/noticias/noticia.asp?numero=18599

[3] Manha, Danilo Siveira (2012). Mídia e Administração Pública: O Acesso da População ao Orçamento Participativo de Atibaia. Dissertação de mestrado: Universidade Paulista, São Paulo. http://repositorio.unip.br/programa-de-pos-graduacao-stricto-sensu-em-comunicacao/midia-e-administracao-publica-o-acesso-da-populacao-ao-orcamento-participativo-de-atibaia/

[4] Prefeitura de Atibaia (2010). Orçamento Participativo: Valorizando Sua Decisão nas Verbas da Prefeitura http://www.atibaia.sp.gov.br/op/arquivos/cartilha.pdf [DEAD LINK]

External Links 

The following are in Portuguese:

Atibaia.com.br - Orçamento Participativo: RegiÆo 8 e Alvinopolis elegem prioridades

Atibaia.com.br - Orçamento Participativo Atibaia 2011

Porto Alegre Orçamento Participativo

Orçamento Participativo Regional 2007/2008

Notes