Data

General Issues
Science & Technology
Health
Environment
Specific Topics
Food Inspection & Safety
Agricultural Biotechnology
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
Norway
Scope of Influence
National
Links
Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Foods in Norway
OECD Innovative Citizen Participation Project
The POLITICIZE Project
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
16
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Consensus Conference
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Funder
Budget of The Biotechnology Advisory Board
Type of Funder
National Government
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior

CASE

Norwegian Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Foods

April 2, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
August 3, 2020 Joyce Chen
July 19, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
July 18, 2020 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Science & Technology
Health
Environment
Specific Topics
Food Inspection & Safety
Agricultural Biotechnology
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
Norway
Scope of Influence
National
Links
Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Foods in Norway
OECD Innovative Citizen Participation Project
The POLITICIZE Project
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
16
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Consensus Conference
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government
Funder
Budget of The Biotechnology Advisory Board
Type of Funder
National Government
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior

16 Norwegian citizens convened at the Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Foods in an effort to include non-experts in order to obtain the views of ordinary people on the genetic modification of food.

Problems and Purpose

Norway organized a first consensus conference on genetically modified food in 1996. In 2000, the debate came back on the agenda of the Norwegian parliament. In this context, the National Committees for Research Ethics and the Norwegian BiotechnologyAdvisory Board decided to organize an open meeting on the use of genetically modified food (15-16 November 2000) as a follow-up to the 1996 consensus conference. The same lay citizens selected for the 1996 consensus conference were invited for this 2000 follow-up. [1]

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

Consensus Conferences

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The panel of lay citizens recommended keeping the moratorium on genetically modified food. In addition, it set out the conditions that should be met before such a moratorium could be lifted, namely: (1) The need for more knowledge to understand the long-term effects on environment and health; (2) Co-ordination of laws and regulations (nationally and internationally); (3) Strengthening of reviews, control, and traceability. [1]

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

Consensus Conferences 

Australian Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Food

Participatory Consensus Conferences 

Japanese Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Crops 

References

[1] Paulis, Emilien; Pilet, Jean-Benoit; Panel, Sophie; Vittori, Davide; Close, Caroline, 2020, "POLITICIZE Dataset", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7X6GT, Harvard Dataverse, V1

External Links

Notes

Data was sourced from OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en