Data

General Issues
Environment
Energy
Specific Topics
Nuclear Energy
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Nuclear consultation: Public trust in Government
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Sortition
Civic Lottery
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government

CASE

Talking Energy: Mini-Public on the Future of Nuclear Power in the UK

April 8, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
March 24, 2021 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Environment
Energy
Specific Topics
Nuclear Energy
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Nuclear consultation: Public trust in Government
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Sortition
Civic Lottery
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Decision Methods
Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government

The Mini-Public on the Future of Nuclear Power was launched by the British government in 2007. It involved 949 participants across nine deliberative events—in Edinburgh, Newcastle, Liverpool, Leicester, Norwich, Cardiff, London, Exeter and Belfast—on 8 September 2007.

Problems and Purpose

In 2007 the government launched a consultation about the possible role for nuclear power within the energy policy framework set out in the 2007 Energy White Paper, not a consultation on energy policy itself. The consultation document on the future of nuclear power was launched in parallel with the Government’s 2007 Energy White Paper. The central part of this consultation was a large-scale deliberative process modelled on previous ‘citizens’ summits’ (i.e. Your Health, Your Say; National Pensions Debate). The objective of the deliberative events was to engage a demographically representative sample of UK citizens in an informed debate and to enable the Government to understand the views of such people on the Government’s preliminary view on nuclear energy as outlined in the consultation document.

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Opinion Leader on behalf of the Government led nine deliberative events with 949 participants across the UK on 8 September 2007.

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Citizens were recruited to be demographically representative of the UK population.

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

An analysis report on the findings from the deliberative events with members of the public was written by Opinion Leader and released in December 2007. In May 2007, the government published its Energy White Paper ‘Meeting the Energy Challenge’, which covered a range of energy issues including nuclear power. At the same time, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI, in June 2007 renamed the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform – BERR), launched a consultation document entitled ‘The Future of Nuclear Power: The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon UK Economy’, seeking "views on the information and arguments set out on whether the private sector should be allowed to build new nuclear power stations."

Yet there remained a concern that the way government approached this consultation may have advanced a pre-ordained solution to a well-rehearsed problem. The DTI, which ran the consultation, had already said that it continued to believe in nuclear power. Gordon Brown told MPs in July 2007, "we have made the decision to continue with nuclear power" even before the new consultation had run half its course – and before the citizens’ summit had taken place. Nonetheless, the government claimed the new consultation process as justifying its announcement in January 2008 that "new nuclear power stations should have a role to play in this country’s future energy mix…it would be in the public interest to allow energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power stations". The main criticism was that the summit and wider consultation was used to legitimise a pre-ordained direction of travel. People have questioned the balance of the material and design of the events. Therefore, it is difficult to gauge the extent to which the summit genuinely influenced government policy.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

This entry is based on the POLITICIZE dataset. More information can be found at the following links:

  • Paulis, Emilien; Pilet, Jean-Benoit; Panel, Sophie; Vittori, Davide; Close, Caroline, 2020, "POLITICIZE Dataset", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7X6GT, Harvard Dataverse, V1
  • Pilet J-B, Paulis E, Panel S.,Vitori D & Close C. 202X The POLITICIZE Dataset: an inventory of Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science.