Data

General Issues
Environment
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining Industries
Specific Topics
Food Inspection & Safety
Agricultural Biotechnology
Regulatory Policy
Location
Denver
Colorado
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
Colorado CIR Statement for Prop. 105
Colorado Mandatory Labeling Initiative Proposition 105
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Research
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Research
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
20
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Initiative Review
Initiative Process
Sortition
Deliberation
Q&A Session
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public

CASE

Colorado Citizens' Initiative Review (CIR) on Proposition 105: Mandatory Labeling of GMOs Initiative

September 3, 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
August 25, 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
June 29, 2019 jxz305
General Issues
Environment
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining Industries
Specific Topics
Food Inspection & Safety
Agricultural Biotechnology
Regulatory Policy
Location
Denver
Colorado
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
Colorado CIR Statement for Prop. 105
Colorado Mandatory Labeling Initiative Proposition 105
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Research
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Research
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
20
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Initiative Review
Initiative Process
Sortition
Deliberation
Q&A Session
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public

The first CIR to take place in Colorado was held to deliberate on prop. 105. 11 members of the CIR voted in favor of prop with 9 members voting against. The proposition was defeated at vote with a 65% majority voting against the mandatory labeling initiative.


Note: the following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it.


Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes