Data

General Issues
Health
Collections
Citizens Voices & Values on Covid-19
Location
British Columbia
Canada
Scope of Influence
Regional
Files
Community conversations - Report back template
Community Conversation Guide
Background Information Booklet
Links
Public Input into Pandemic Planning
Start Date
Ongoing
Yes
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Research
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Co-governance
Research
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
Informal conversation spaces
Research or experimental method
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Online Deliberation
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
Type of Organizer/Manager
Academic Institution
Type of Funder
Academic Institution
Staff
Yes
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials
Appointed Public Servants

CASE

Public Input into Pandemic Planning: Deliberating tradeoffs in COVID-19 policymaking

General Issues
Health
Collections
Citizens Voices & Values on Covid-19
Location
British Columbia
Canada
Scope of Influence
Regional
Files
Community conversations - Report back template
Community Conversation Guide
Background Information Booklet
Links
Public Input into Pandemic Planning
Start Date
Ongoing
Yes
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Research
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Co-governance
Research
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
Informal conversation spaces
Research or experimental method
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Online Deliberation
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Online
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Idea Generation
Type of Organizer/Manager
Academic Institution
Type of Funder
Academic Institution
Staff
Yes
Implementers of Change
Elected Public Officials
Appointed Public Servants

This multi-pronged project seeks to provide rapid public input for policymaking. It proposes a repeatable online deliberative process that addresses pressing policy questions and trade-offs related to the COVID-19 public health emergency in British Columbia.

Problems and Purpose

The policy response to the public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic involves important trade-offs for individuals, communities, and the economy. For instance, although social distancing helps flatten the curve, it produces costs such as isolation and the loss of income. Policymakers can navigate these trade-offs by engaging with the public — including marginalized groups — and building trust. This initiative proposes a deliberative design to explore trade-offs and use public input to inform an effective collective response to the crisis. The proposed design uses online deliberation to determine what residents of British Columbia value, want, and need. The purpose is to provide public input for planning the next steps in the provincial pandemic response [1].

Background History and Context

The deliberative design used by the Public Input into Pandemic Planning initiative has gone through various iterations. It has been used in more than 25 projects in Canada, Australia, the US, the UK, and Europe, including the debate on Biobanks in British Columbia. Due to the current public health crisis, adjustments to the design have been made to move the deliberative process online [2]. 

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

This initiative is developed by a multi-disciplinary collective of researchers from British Columbia and Ontario [3]. 

Participant Recruitment and Selection

There are three different ways participants can be involved in the project. First, citizens will be invited (through social media, news organizations, networks, etc.) to host self-facilitated online deliberations — called community conversations — with their friends and family. Second, in parallel to this voluntary participation, some participants will be selected to take part in 20 facilitated small-group deliberations of 8 to 10 citizens. These participants will have completed a survey, and the selection process will be based on demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and ethnic diversity. The third and final component of the participation cycle will be a facilitated large-group deliberation held with 20 to 24 selected participants who haven't taken part in the previous facilitated small-group process. 

Methods and Tools Used

This multi-pronged deliberative process uses online deliberation to engage citizens in identifying issues and developing recommendations. In collaboration with policymakers, the organizers identify the questions and trade-offs for which they seek public input [4] and create a background information booklet that will be available to the participants on the project website [5]. The project relies on facilitated deliberation in small and large groups, and on community-based deliberation. The leaders of the community conversations will have to submit a summary of their discussion and recommendations on the website. The facilitated groups will be recorded and transcribed, and the facilitators will provide summaries of their group's discussions. 

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

The deliberative cycle is designed to produce public input for decision-makers quickly. The first topic identified is the use of contact tracing apps and the associated potential benefits and drawbacks [6]. 

Figure 1: Deliberative cycle

Source: Background Information Booklet [7]

The questions for the facilitated online deliberation and the self-facilitated community conversations are available on the website [8]. As depicted in Figure 1, community conversations (1) and small-group deliberations (2) will be held in parallel. Both will meet once, and the latter will be limited to 90 minutes. Following this first stage, the 8 to 10 participants selected for the facilitated large-group deliberation will meet over four days for 90-minute sessions (3). They will first deliberate among themselves before focusing on the summaries and recommendations generated in the previous stage. They will then create a final report for decision-makers that includes recommendations and the reasoning used in support of the recommendations.

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Know what influence and effects this initiative had? Help us complete this section!

Analysis and Lessons Learned

Want to contribute an analysis of this initiative? Help us complete this section!

See Also

Biobanking in British Columbia

References

[1] Let’s Talk About Pandemic Policy, http://chspr.ubc.ca/covid19/

[2] Burgess MM, Longstaff H, O’Doherty KC. Assessing deliberative design of public input on biobanks. In: Dodds S, Ankenhy A, eds. Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in Contested Domains. Routledge Press; 2016: 243-276. 

[3] Let’s Talk About Pandemic Policy, http://chspr.ubc.ca/covid19/

[4] Deliberation Questions, http://chspr.ubc.ca/covid19/deliberation-questions/

[5] Background Information Booklet, http://chspr.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2020/05/Background-Information-Booklet.pdf

[6] Let’s Talk About Pandemic Policy, http://chspr.ubc.ca/covid19/

[7] Background Information Booklet,  http://chspr.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2020/05/Background-Information-Booklet.pdf

[8] Deliberation Questions, http://chspr.ubc.ca/covid19/deliberation-questions/ 

External Links

Website of the project

Notes