Citizens Voices & Values on Covid-19 – Participedia

en

Quick Submit

All Cases Methods Organizations

The Citizens Voices & Values on Covid-19 Collection contains: 21 Cases, 3 Methods, 0 Organizations.

case

Deliberative Consultation on Trade-offs Related to Using 'COVIDSafe' Contact Tracing Technology

This project explores the trade-offs in using contact tracing technology to manage the risk of community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Participants make recommendations on how contact tracing technology should and shouldn't be used as a precondition for re-opening organisations and businesses.

Updated February 1, 2023

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Citizens’ Assembly on restrictions and recommendations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Researchers at the University of Turku in Finland convened 70 people for a citizens’ assembly on COVID-19 policies. The goal was to research the evolution of the participants’ attitudes concerning containment measures and the extent to which expert hearings influenced them.

Updated October 25, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Bristol Citizens' Assembly

Bristol Citizens' Assembly was part of a three-phase process created by the city of Bristol to gather public input to inform its COVID-19 recovery plan. The sixty randomly selected members met online for four weekends between January to March 2021.

Updated May 6, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Citizens' committee on vaccination against COVID-19

In order to support the COVID-19 vaccination strategy in France, a citizens' committee has been created by the CESE. This group is made up of 35 randomly selected citizens and aims to provide advice and recommendations during the vaccination campaign.

Updated April 15, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Scottish Parliament Citizens’ Panel on COVID-19

The COVID-19 Committee of the Scottish Parliament convened a citizens’ panel to inform its oversight on the measures put in place by the Government. The panel was comprised of 19 citizens randomly selected and organized virtually over four meetings in January and February 2021.

Updated April 15, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Resilient Day (La journée de la résilience)

The Brussels Environmental Administration intends to launch a 'resilience day'. 150 randomly selected citizens will deliberate during 3 days on the question 'how to make Brussels a more resilient city' in order to provide public authorities with policy recommendations.

Updated March 30, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Scottish Crowdsourcing Exercise "Coronavirus (COVID-19): framework for decision making"

The Scottish Government launched a digital platform as part of a public engagement exercise in which it sought public input on the approaches and principles that would guide decision-making related to transitioning out of the coronavirus (COVID-19) lockdown arrangements.

Updated March 3, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Public Input into Pandemic Planning: Deliberating tradeoffs in COVID-19 policymaking

This multi-pronged project seeks to provide rapid public input for policymaking. It proposes a repeatable online deliberative process that addresses pressing policy questions and trade-offs related to the COVID-19 public health emergency in British Columbia.

Updated February 27, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Connecting to Congress Online Town Halls on the COVID-19 emergency

Connecting to Congress organizes single-issue, non-partisan, online town halls. In response to the COVID-19 crisis, it uses deliberative town halls to share information between Members and their constituents and help identify concerns and issues in the Member's district.

Updated February 16, 2021

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Nantes Métropole Citizens' Convention

Nantes Métropole is convening an online citizens' convention to learn lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. From November 2020 to February 2021, 80 randomly selected citizens will deliberate and present a series of recommendations to the local elected officials.

Updated December 21, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Online Public Dialogues on COVID-19 Winter Preparedness

On behalf of the Academy of Medical Sciences, three online public workshops were conducted in the UK by Ipsos MORI to explore the public’s concerns and priorities regarding the preparation for a second wave of COVID-19 cases over Winter 2020-21.

Updated November 25, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Dialogue and Deliberative Workshops on COVID-19 and the NHS (National Health Service)

The Imperial College Health Partners and Ipsos MORI, on behalf of NHS England and NHS Improvement, convened six dialogue and deliberative workshops in London. The two-stage project gathered insights on Londoners’ concerns and explored their views on measures related to COVID-19.

Updated November 24, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Climate Assembly UK and the COVID-19 crisis

The Climate Assembly UK was convened by six Select Committees of the House of Commons to discuss how the UK should reach its net-zero greenhouse gas emissions target. Following the COVID-19 crisis, it conducted a discussion of the impacts of the pandemic on climate action.

Updated November 17, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Citizens’ Panel – Planning the West Midlands’ Recovery

The West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) commissioned a citizens’ panel to address the economic and social impacts of the COVID-19 public health crisis. The panel sought citizens’ input to inform and guide the priorities for the region’s recovery.

Updated October 30, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

Oregon Citizens' Assembly on COVID-19 Recovery

Healthy Democracy and Oregon’s Kitchen Table organized the first statewide citizens’ assembly in Oregon to inform the policies needed to forge a path beyond the crises engendered by COVID-19. Thirty-six randomly selected citizens took part in this online deliberative process.

Updated October 17, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

#LockDownDebate: Rapid online deliberation on contact tracing

Public policy on the COVID-19 crisis requires public engagement. This project trialled an online deliberative process designed to produce rapid public input for decision-making processes in a context where the subject matter is ever-changing.

Updated September 16, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
method

Decision-Focused Public Engagement Table (DPET)

DPET was developed between 2005 and 2009, when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its partners ran nine public engagement projects on influenza vaccine priorities, pandemic planning, and other issues. The model is distinctive in its inclusion of citizens-at-large and key stakeholders.

Updated May 24, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

CDC's Public Engagement Pilot Project on Pandemic Influenza (2005)

The purpose of the CDC's 2005 Public Engagement Pilot Project on Pandemic Influenza (PEPPPI) was to inform decision-makers about the public’s priorities for the use of pandemic influenza vaccine during a period of anticipated shortage.

Updated May 24, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
case

The Public Engagement Project on Vaccine Prioritization for Pandemic Influenza

An interagency workgroup sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Homeland Security was established in 2006 to revisit initial recommendations made in November 2005 and set forth new national guidance on vaccine use in the case of a pandemic.

Updated May 24, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark
method

Deliberative Townhalls

Deliberative Townhalls add four key design features to the traditional town hall meeting: 1) recruiting a representative sample of constituents, 2) neutral, independent third-party moderation, 3) focus on a single issue, & 4) non-partisan background information in advance.

Updated May 20, 2020

Remove Bookmark Add Bookmark