CASE
University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Social Sciences Climate Assembly
- General Issues
- Environment
- Science & Technology
- Education
- Specific Topics
- Climate Change
- Higher Education
- Sustainable Development
- Scope of Influence
- Organization
- Parent of this Case
- Danish Citizens' Parliament on climate
- Files
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rommendations Report 2024
- Status to the climate assembly after 12 months
- First status report climate assembly May 2024.pdf
- Links
- City of Copenhgaen (2020) Creating the World's First CArbon Nuetral Capital
- KNOCA Founding Chair Graham Smith guides expertise evaluating Danish Climate assemblies
- Chair Graham Smith leads the KNOCA network for climate assemblies.
- Official United Nations briefing details early Copenhagen climate negoations drafts
- Start Date
- End Date
- Ongoing
- No
- Time Limited or Repeated?
- A single, defined period of time
- If Repeated: Representation Change - Who?
- No
- If Repeated: Representation Change - What?
- No
- Purpose/Goal
- Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
- Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
- Research
- Approach
- Co-governance
- Consultation
- Research
- Did the represented group shape the agenda?
- Yes
- Total Number of Participants
- 242
- Open to All or Limited to Some?
- Mixed
- Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
- Stratified Random Sample
- Targeted Demographics
- Students
- Low-Income Earners
- Anonymous or Identified Online
- Anonymous
- Represented Group Characteristics
- Pre-defined groups of individuals based on shared identity
- Most affected individuals
- Represented Group
- Low-Income Earners
- Students
- Other group(s)
- General Types of Methods
- Deliberative and dialogic process
- Collaborative approaches
- Public meetings
- General Types of Tools/Techniques
- Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
- Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
- Recruit or select participants
- Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
- Deliberation
- Citizens’ Assembly
- Organizational Learning
- Real Time Voting
- Q&A Session
- Expert Advisory Panel
- Sortition
- Legality
- Yes
- Facilitators
- Yes
- Facilitator Training
- Professional Facilitators
- Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
- Face-to-Face
- Types of Interaction Among Participants
- Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
- Ask & Answer Questions
- Teaching/Instructing
- Information & Learning Resources
- Expert Presentations
- Written Briefing Materials
- Decision Methods
- Voting
- If Voting
- Super-Majoritarian
- Communication of Insights & Outcomes
- Public Report
- Public Hearings/Meetings
- New Media
- Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning
- Both
- Argument Tools
- Issue maps
- Argument maps
- Decision-support systems
- Facilitator Automation
- Partly
- Face to Face and Online Integration
- Separated
- Gamification
- No
- Synchronous Asynchronous
- Asynchronous
- Text Video
- Video and Audio
- Virtual Reality
- No
- Representation Claims Made
- Official Communication
- Public Hearings/Meetings
- New Media (social media, blogging, texting)
- Feedback Methods
- Digital Engagement
- Public Hearings/Meetings
- Others
- Type of Organizer/Manager
- Academic Institution
- For-Profit Business
- Type of Funder
- Academic Institution
- Staff
- Yes
- Volunteers
- No
- Behind Claim
- Primary funder
- Evidence of Impact
- Yes
- Outcome or Impact Achieved
- Partially
- Types of Change
- Changes in how institutions operate
- Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
- Implementers of Change
- Stakeholder Organizations
- Experts
- Most Affected
- They were well represented
- Implementers Connected
- Yes
- Formal Evaluation
- Yes
- Represented Group in Evaluation
- Yes