Data

General Issues
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining Industries
Science & Technology
Environment
Specific Topics
Food Inspection & Safety
Agricultural Biotechnology
Regulatory Policy
Location
Salem
Oregon
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
CIR Statement for Ballot Measure 92
Oregon Ballot Measure 92 on GMO Labeling
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Research
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Research
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
20
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
stratified
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Initiative Review
Initiative Process
Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review
Sortition
Q&A Session
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Ask & Answer Questions
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Primary Organizer/Manager
Healthy Democracy
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Type of Funder
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public

CASE

Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review on Measure 92: Mandatory Labeling of GMOs Initiative

September 3, 2019 Scott Fletcher, Participedia Team
June 29, 2019 jxz305
General Issues
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining Industries
Science & Technology
Environment
Specific Topics
Food Inspection & Safety
Agricultural Biotechnology
Regulatory Policy
Location
Salem
Oregon
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
CIR Statement for Ballot Measure 92
Oregon Ballot Measure 92 on GMO Labeling
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Research
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Research
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
20
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
stratified
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Initiative Review
Initiative Process
Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review
Sortition
Q&A Session
Deliberation
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Ask & Answer Questions
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Primary Organizer/Manager
Healthy Democracy
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Type of Funder
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public
The following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it. click for more info

A citizen's initiative review was held in August 2014 to deliberate on proposed ballot measure 92 on GMO labeling. 11 of the 20 panelists in the CIR opposed the measure where the remaining 9 favored it. Measure 92 itself would be defeated at vote, by only a very small margin.


Note: the following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it.


Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes