Data

General Issues
Housing
Economics
Social Welfare
Specific Topics
Affordable Housing
Right to Adequate Housing
Government Spending
Location
Portland
Oregon
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
CIR statement on Measure 26-199
Oregon Ballot Measure 26-199 on Portland Metro Region Affordable Housing Bond
Public Projects Page on Bond
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Research
Approach
Research
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
20
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Legislation, policy, or frameworks
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Initiative Review
Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review
Sortition
Deliberation
Q&A Session
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Primary Organizer/Manager
Healthy Democracy
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public

CASE

Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review (CIR) on Measure 26-199: Portland Metro Region Affordable Housing Bond

2 de septiembre de 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
7 de julio de 2019 jxz305
General Issues
Housing
Economics
Social Welfare
Specific Topics
Affordable Housing
Right to Adequate Housing
Government Spending
Location
Portland
Oregon
United States
Scope of Influence
Regional
Links
CIR statement on Measure 26-199
Oregon Ballot Measure 26-199 on Portland Metro Region Affordable Housing Bond
Public Projects Page on Bond
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Research
Approach
Research
Citizenship building
Spectrum of Public Participation
Inform
Total Number of Participants
20
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Legislation, policy, or frameworks
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Initiative Review
Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review
Sortition
Deliberation
Q&A Session
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Decision Methods
Voting
If Voting
Majoritarian Voting
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Primary Organizer/Manager
Healthy Democracy
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes
Volunteers
No
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Lay Public

20 citizens of Portland Oregon deliberated on Measure 26-199 which would authorize 652.8 million in bonds to fund affordable housing in Washington, Clackamas, and Multnomah counties of Oregon. 12 panelists voted against the measure however the measure passed the referendum.


Note: the following entry is a stub. Please help us complete it.


Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes